5
C A L I F O R N I A A F T E R - S C H O O L P R O G R A M Q U A L I T Y S E L F - A S S E S S M E N T T O O L
What’s inside the QSA Tool: Eleven Program Quality Elements
The QSA Tool is organized into eleven program quality elements.
Quality Element
Section 1: Program Design & Assessment
Section 2: Program Administration & Finance
Section 3: Community Partnerships & Collaboration
Section 4: Alignment & Linkages with the School Day
Section 5: Program Environment & Safety
Section 6: Youth Development
Section 7: Staff Recruitment & Professional Development
Section 8: Family Involvement
Section 9: Nutrition & Physical Activity
Section 10: Promoting Diversity, Access, Equity, & Inclusion
Section 11: Effectively Supporting English Learners
Using the QSA Tool for Program
Planning & Professional Development
When developing an action plan based on the QSA Tool ratings,
after school programs should consider the following:
What is the current Performance Level in our program?
Practices that receive a 1 or 2 rating will likely need to be ad-
dressed in the short-term. Practices that receive a 3 rating will
likely need additional attention within the current school/fiscal
year and practices that are rated as a 4 should be sustained.
How urgent is the need to address the practice?
Practices that have a direct impact on participants’ health and
safety or that are closely linked to program goals should take
priority in the action plan.
Each program quality element includes a section at the end to re-
cord thoughts about planned next steps and technical assistance
needs. The User’s Guide includes suggestions for programs to
develop an action plan based on results of the self-assessment.
For more detailed information on how to use the QSA Tool,
please see the California After School Program Quality Self-Assess-
ment Tool User’s Guide.
Scoring the QSA Tool
The QSA Tool uses the following rating system to assess the
degree to which each quality indicator is evident in the program.
Level 1: Our program is just beginning to work in this area and
has an urgent need to address this practice. Our pro-
gram can be much better at this than we are currently.
Level 2: Our program has done some work in this area but will
need targeted support to move to the next level. Our
program is making progress, but can improve further.
Level 3: Our program has achieved a high level of proficiency in
this area and needs only a little additional work to be
exceptionally proficient. Our program is very good at
this practice.
Level 4: Our program is exceptionally proficient in this practice
and can demonstrate this in observable ways. This is an
area of quality practice where our program can serve as
an example for others.
Don’t Know: I am not familiar enough with this aspect of the
program to rate performance on this indicator or am
just not sure how to rate it at this time.
After school programs should strive to meet Level 3 or 4 for each
indicator to demonstrate overall program quality. Assistance and
support should be sought for areas scoring as Level 1 or Level 2.