2017
AP World History
Sample Student Responses
and Scoring Commentary
© 2017 The College Board. College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo
are registered trademarks of the College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
AP Central is the ocial online home for the AP Program: apcentral.collegeboard.org
Inside:
R Long Essay Question 2
R Scoring Guideline
R Student Samples
R Scoring Commentary
AP
®
WORLD HISTORY
2017 SCORING GUIDELINES
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
Question 2 Long Essay Question
Maximum Possible Points: 6
Describe and explain a significant continuity and a significant change in labor migration in the period
1450–1750
C.E.” (Historical thinking skill: Continuity and Change)
Please note:
Each point of the rubric is earned independently, e.g., a student could earn the point for synthesis
without earning the point for thesis.
Unique evidence from the student response is required to earn each point, e.g., evidence in the
student response that qualifies for either of the targeted skill points could not be used to earn the
point for thesis.
Points
Scoring Criteria
Notes
A: Thesis 0-1
Thesis:
Presents a thesis that
makes a historically defensible
claim and responds to all parts of
the question. The thesis must
consist of one or more sentences
located in one place, either in the
introduction or the conclusion.
(1 point)
Must address at least one continuity and at least
one change in labor migrations and have some
explanatory element for each.
Does NOT have to mention specific migrations.
Sample: A continuity during this period in labor
migration was the forced movement of artisans,
manual laborers, and prisoners by states to build
empires, while a major change was the
development of North American colonies where
free, forced, and indentured migrant laborers were
used to build new economies.
B: Argument Development: Using the
Historical Thinking Skill 0-2
Argument Development
Describes: Describes a historical
continuity AND a change.
(1 point)
Must describe/identify at least one relevant example
of continuity and one example of change in labor
migration in the period 1450–1750 C.E.
Samples: European colonization of the Americas,
regional migration within the Americas, trans-
Atlantic slave trade, importance of growing sea-
based trade networks shaping migrations.
Argument Development
Explains: Explains the reasons
for a historical continuity AND a
change. (1 point)
Must explain a cause for at least one relevant
example of continuity and a cause for one relevant
example of change in labor migration in the period
1450–1750
C.E. and connect them back to the
argument.
AP
®
WORLD HISTORY
2017 SCORING GUIDELINES
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
Question 2 Long Essay Question (continued)
C: Argument Development: Using Evidence 0-2
Using Evidence Examples:
Addresses the topic of the
question with specific examples
of relevant evidence. (1 point)
Must address the topic of the question by referring
to at least TWO specific examples or pieces of
relevant evidence reflecting labor migrations. Essays
can earn this point without having a stated thesis or
a relevant argument.
Samples: trans-Atlantic slave trade, trans-Saharan
slave trade, debt or indentured servitude in the
Atlantic world, slavery in the Indian Ocean; free
Europeans to the Americas, rural to urban
migrations in Europe, Ottoman Empire slave
soldiers, Chinese migrations throughout Southeast
Asia.
Using Evidence Effective
Substantiation:
Utilizes specific examples of
evidence to fully and effectively
substantiate the stated thesis or a
relevant argument. (1 point)
Must both present a significant amount of relevant
evidence and clearly and consistently link that
evidence to an argument about continuity or
change in labor migration in the period 1450–1750
C.E.
Synthesis 0-1
Synthesis: Extends the
argument by explaining the
connection between the
argument and either a
development in a
different historical
period
geographical area
a course theme and/or
approach that is not the
focus of the essay or
a different discipline.
(1 point)
(Period) may offer a relevant connection between
the in-period continuity and/or change in labor
migration and developments in other periods, e.g.
during 1750−1900 C.E. or 1945−2000.
(Geography) not allowable because prompt is global.
(Theme) may connect the continuity and/or change
in labor migration in this period to a course theme
or approach that is NOT economic history.
Examples might include migrations driven by
religious or environmental factors.
(Discipline) may connect the argument to a different
discipline, such as political science, sociology, or
demography, to extend a discussion of the
continuity and/or change in labor migration.
If response is completely blank, enter - - for all four score categories A, B, C, and D.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
AP
®
WORLD HISTORY
2017 SCORING COMMENTARY
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
Long Essay Question 2
Overview
The intent of this question was to assess students’ knowledge of continuties and changes in patterns of
labor migration in the period between 1450 and 1750
C.E. This content is part of Key Concepts 4.1, 4.2, and
4.3 of the AP World History Curriculum Framework (Globalizing Networks of Communication and
Exchange; New Forms of Social Organization and Modes of Production; and State Consolidation and
Imperial Expansion). The question’s geographic scope was global, and its choronological scope
encompassed the period of new large-scale mass migrations from Afro-Eurasia to the Americas that
followed the Age of Exploration, as well as the continuation of previous patterns of labor migrations, such
as intra-Africa slavery, slave trade networks in the Muslim World, and global rural-to-urban migration
movements. The question was designed to allow students to demonstrate their knowledge of multiple
types of labor migrations, including involuntary migration (slavery, indentured servitude) and voluntary
migration (for economic, religious, or political reasons). Students were expected to present a historically
defensible thesis, describe both a historical continuity and a historical change in labor migrations during
this period, explain the reasons for the historical continuity and the reasons for the historical change,
address the topic with specific examples of relevant evidence, deploy the evidence to fully and effectively
substantiate the thesis or a relevant argument, and extend the argument by either connecting it to a
different course theme or another discipline or by comparing it to developments in other time periods.
Sample: 2A
Score: 6
The thesis presented in the first paragraph is sufficient to have earned the thesis point. The change is
identified in the first sentence, where the response identifies that “European hegemony” evolves as a result
of labor migrations following the discovery of the New World in 1492. The continuity of African slave trade is
correctly identified as having continued since the ancient period.
The essay earned the first argument development point for describing a continuity and a change. The
continuity of slave trade is identified in the beginning of the second paragraph. The first sentence of this
paragraph identifies the continuation of the slave trade and not simply the labor system of slavery. The essay
identifies earlier examples of this slave trade, and then connects them to the forced labor migration of African
slaves in this time period. A change is described in the fourth paragraph, by identifying the evolving
European hegemony due to the African slave trade previously introduced.
The essay earned the second argument development point for explaining a historical continuity and a
change. The assertion of change is discussed quite thoroughly in the third paragraph, where the developing
Atlantic slave trade is explained through the implementation of mercantilism and the need for cheap labor
sources. The continuity of the brutality of slave trade is discussed in the second body paragraph, where the
continued selling of enemies into slavery is explained as a result of needed goods. The continued need for
these goods and weapons leads to the practice continuing throughout the time period.
The essay provides several examples that earned the first using evidence point, including naming of specific
tribes (Ashanti), the goods traded for (guns), and evolving ethnic divides (Creole, peninsulares, etc.).
AP
®
WORLD HISTORY
2017 SCORING COMMENTARY
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
Long Essay Question 2 (continued)
The essay earned the second using evidence point for effective substantiation by using evidence in several
instances to substantiate the argument being made. In the second body paragraph, for example, the
evidence of earlier time period slave trade complements the evidence provided of slave trade within this
period (Ashanti, guns, etc.) to substantiate a solid argument about the continuity of slave trade as a forced
migration.
The essay provides an especially high-level synthesis response, which earned the synthesis point. The essay
does an exceptional job of connecting developments in art history with the forced slave migrations. While the
essay develops an argument about continued poor treatment on the slave trade routes, the final paragraph
connects this clearly to the Impressionist movement and a specific image by Joseph Turner. The essay also
explains the cause of the connection, which lies in the inhumanity of the social hierarchy that developed
around the justification of slavery.
Sample: 2B
Score: 4
The essay attempts a thesis but failed to earn the point for several reasons. Most significantly the argument
being presented, “laborers working under harsh conditions,” is an argument about labor, but not migration.
In addition, the identification of change and continuity lack the necessary explanatory element necessary.
The essay earned the first argument development point. The essay identifies a change in labor migration in
the first sentence of the second paragraph. This identification includes the phrase “continued to migrate”
and the clarification “under very harsh conditions” so that it meets expectations for describing a change in
the migration itself. The paragraph goes on to describe the specific “horrible conditions” of the Middle
Passage. The description of change in the first five lines of the third paragraph identifies the use of slave
trade to the Americas as a change in the time period through reference to the increase in the “frequency”
and referencing “more” slaves being taken to plantations in the New World.
The essay did not earn the second argument development point. Though a continuity in labor migration
“under very harsh conditions” is identified, the essay fails to explain why this practice continued. Similarly
the change identified (increased slavery to the New World) is never explained.
The essay earned the first using evidence point by providing multiple examples with connections to labor
migrations, including identification of “African slaves,” “plantations” as the end point of the harsh treatment
of slave migration, and specific details of the harsh treatment (disease, overcrowding, etc.).
The essay earned the second using evidence point by using evidence to substantiate the continued harsh
treatment seen in slave migrations in the first body paragraph. The details of the harsh treatment reinforce
the argument that this treatment was a continuous element of the forced migration of slaves.
The essay earned the synthesis point in the third paragraph by exploring the development of new social
classes influenced by the continued importation (forced migration) of slaves. The essay develops this
assertion with a detailed explanation of the demographic changes in plantation society.
AP
®
WORLD HISTORY
2017 SCORING COMMENTARY
© 2017 The College Board.
Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
Long Essay Question 2 (continued)
Sample: 2C
Score: 1
The essay did not earn the thesis point. While the attempt at identifying a continuity argument in the first
paragraph (“use of slaves and agriculture”) opens the door to an acceptable continuity, it does not connect
the “use” of slaves to their forced migration. Similarly, the attempted change focuses on trade routes and
methods of travel, rather than identifying an element of labor migration that changed.
The essay did not earn the first argument development point. The attempt to develop a slavery argument
never advances beyond connecting the use of slavery to the migration of slaves. The same holds true of the
agricultural element, which is a labor argument but not tied to migration. The essay does identify the use of
ships to transport African slaves, but this is not a historically accurate change (as ships had been used for
transport for years.)
The essay did not earn the second argument development point. No acceptable arguments are introduced
and so explanation is not possible.
The essay fulfills the minimum expectation of two evidence points, so it earned the first using evidence
point. It identifies slaves dying of disease from their transport and then identifies the “Middle Passage.”
The essay did not earn the second using evidence point because minimal evidence is presented, and it is not
effectively used to substantiate an argument about labor migration.
The last paragraph could be interpreted as a failed attempt at synthesis. It demonstrates no connection to an
argument or clear feature of labor migration, and so it did not earn the synthesis point.