Page 1 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Private life
Version 2.0
This guidance tells decision makers how to consider applications for permission to
stay in the UK on the basis of private life, made by a person who arrived in the UK as
an adult, by a person who arrived in the UK as a child, and by such a person who is
now over 18 who arrived in the UK as a child. It also tells decision makers how to
deal with applications from a dependent child born in the UK to a person on the
private life route.
Page 2 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Contents
Contents ......................................................................................................................... 2
About this guidance ....................................................................................................... 5
Contacts ..................................................................................................................... 5
Publication .................................................................................................................. 5
Changes from last version of this guidance .............................................................. 6
Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7
Background ................................................................................................................ 7
Concession for granting longer periods of leave and early indefinite leave to
remain ..................................................................................................................... 8
Transitional provisions ............................................................................................... 8
Other information about this guidance ...................................................................... 8
Approach to children and young adults ........................................................................ 9
Considering applications from children on the basis of 7 years continuous
residence in the UK ................................................................................................... 9
Where permission should be granted if a child meets both Appendix Private Life
and Appendix FM ..................................................................................................... 10
Dependent children born in the UK ......................................................................... 11
Burden and standard of proof, and evidential flexibility.............................................. 12
Validity ......................................................................................................................... 13
Overview .................................................................................................................. 13
Application does not meet all of the validity requirements ..................................... 13
If the application is valid .......................................................................................... 13
Where a private life claim is being made under Article 8 of the European
Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).................................................................... 13
Grounds for refusal - suitability ................................................................................... 15
Suitability requirements not met .............................................................................. 16
Child – 7 years continuous residence in the UK ......................................................... 17
Residence requirements .......................................................................................... 17
Applying for extension of permission to stay .......................................................... 17
Reasonable test ....................................................................................................... 17
Assessing whether it is reasonable to expect a child to leave the UK ............... 17
Young adult who arrived in the UK as a child ......................................................... 18
Residence requirements for a young adult ......................................................... 18
Applications for extension of permission to stay as a young person .................. 19
Further consideration ........................................................................................... 19
Page 3 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Adult private life applications ....................................................................................... 20
Residence requirements for an adult ...................................................................... 20
Less than 20 years residence ................................................................................. 20
Assessing whether there are ‘very significant obstacles to integration’ into the
country of return ....................................................................................................... 20
Cultural background ............................................................................................. 21
Length of time spent in the country of return....................................................... 22
Family, friends and social network ...................................................................... 22
Faith, political or sexual orientation or gender identity........................................ 22
Common claims.................................................................................................... 22
Private life in the UK ................................................................................................ 23
Assessing very significant obstacles into the country of return if the applicant
arrived in the UK as a child .................................................................................. 23
Private life applicants who have made a protection or asylum claim that is
inadmissible or might be inadmissible ................................................................. 24
Continuous residence .................................................................................................. 25
Calculating absences for continuous residence ..................................................... 25
Assessing the evidence ....................................................................................... 26
Burden and standard of proof .............................................................................. 26
Format of evidence .............................................................................................. 27
Where evidence is missing or inadequate .......................................................... 27
Eligibility requirement for private life route relying on Article 8 of the European
Convention on Human Rights ................................................................................. 27
The best interests of a relevant child ................................................................... 29
How to consider the best interests of a relevant child ..................................... 30
Decision ....................................................................................................................... 32
Granting permission to stay on the private life route .............................................. 32
Child or young person .......................................................................................... 32
Private life claims – no application required .................................................... 32
Adults .................................................................................................................... 32
Extension of stay .................................................................................................. 33
Choice on duration of leave and the Immigration Health Surcharge .................. 33
Approach where the applicant has wrongly self-identified they are entitled to
choose their duration of leave.............................................................................. 33
Approach where a child or young person has requested 60 months leave but not
paid the required fee ............................................................................................ 34
Approach where a child included in a family application is to be granted leave on
the private life route.............................................................................................. 34
Page 4 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Refusing permission to stay on the private life route .............................................. 34
Right of appeal ..................................................................................................... 35
Conditions of stay .................................................................................................... 35
Employment ......................................................................................................... 35
Study..................................................................................................................... 35
Access to public funds ......................................................................................... 35
Dependent children born in the UK to a person on the private life route ................... 37
Validity requirements ............................................................................................... 37
Suitability requirements ........................................................................................... 38
Eligibility requirements ............................................................................................. 38
Relationship .......................................................................................................... 38
Other parent’s immigration status .................................................................... 39
Assessing sole responsibility ........................................................................... 39
Assessing serious and compelling reasons..................................................... 39
Care requirement ................................................................................................. 39
Decision.................................................................................................................... 40
Granting permission to stay on the private life route .......................................... 40
Duration of leave .................................................................................................. 40
Refusing permission to stay on the private life route .......................................... 40
Right of appeal ..................................................................................................... 40
Conditions of stay .................................................................................................... 40
Employment ......................................................................................................... 40
Study..................................................................................................................... 41
Access to public funds ......................................................................................... 41
Decisions in cases where a valid application is not required ................................. 42
Allowed appeals against refusal under the private life rules .................................. 42
Compelling compassionate factors ............................................................................. 44
Page 5 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
About this guidance
This guidance tells decision makers how to consider applications for permission to
stay on the basis of private life and claims based on Article 8 (on the basis of private
life) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
It includes guidance on:
• children under the age of 18 years who have at least 7 years continuous
residence in the UK, and it is not reasonable for them to leave - children born in
the UK who have at least 7 years continuous residence in the UK can apply for
immediate settlement on the basis of private life. See the settlement guidance
• a young adult aged 18 years and above and under 25 years who arrived in the
UK as a child and has spent at least half their life in the UK
• a person who is over 18 years of age who has spent at least 20 years in the UK
• a person who is over 18 years of age, who has spent less than 20 years in the
UK, but for whom there would be very significant obstacles to their return
• consideration under Article 8 of the ECHR where a person does not meet the
eligibility or suitability requirement on the private life route
• dependent children born in the UK to a person who has permission or is
seeking permission on the private life route
It sets out the approach to considering applications from children whether they are
applying on their own or as part of a family group. It sets out what permission should
be granted when a child meets the private life rules but also dependent child rules in
Appendix FM.
There is separate guidance for considering applications for settlement under
Appendix Private Life.
Contacts
If you have any questions about the guidance and your line manager or senior
caseworker cannot help you or you think that the guidance has factual errors, then
email the Human Rights and Family Policy Unit.
If you notice any formatting errors in this guidance (broken links, spelling mistakes
and so on) or have any comments about the layout or navigability of the guidance
then you can email the Guidance Rules and Forms team.
Publication
Below is information on when this version of the guidance was published:
• version 2.0
• published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Page 6 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Changes from last version of this guidance
Updated to:
• include links to new guidance covering access to public funds
• remove information relating to police registration
• include guidance about consideration of compelling compassionate factors
Related content
Contents
Page 7 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Introduction
This section introduces you to considering applications for permission to stay on the
basis of private life.
Background
Appendix Private Life was introduced by Statement of changes HC 1118 and
replaced the previous private life provisions in Part 7 of the Immigration Rules.
It applies to all applications for permission to stay made on the basis of private life in
the UK on or after 20 June 2022. A private life application can only be made in the
UK.
Private life, as enshrined in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
(ECHR), is a general right that is applied to cases in an individual way. It states:
8(1) Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home, and
his correspondence.
8(2) There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this
right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a
democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety, or the
economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the
protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of
others.
Article 8 ECHR is a qualified right so as to allow countries to set requirements which
properly balance the individual right to respect for private or family life with the public
interest in safeguarding the economic well-being of the UK by controlling
immigration, in protecting the public from foreign criminals and in protecting the
rights and freedoms of others.
The private life Immigration Rules therefore express a policy on private life that is
compatible with Article 8 ECHR on private life. In the event of an adverse decision
and an appeal being considered, section 5A of the Nationality Immigration and
Asylum Act 2002 is the primary legislation designed to produce in all cases a final
result which is compatible with Article 8 ECHR, including in those cases where the
requirements of the Immigration Rules may not have been met.
The private life Immigration Rules and this guidance do, in their entirety, reflect the
duty contained in section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 to
have regard to the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of a child in the UK.
This guidance and the Immigration Rules it covers form part of the arrangements for
ensuring that we give practical effect to these obligations.
Page 8 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Concession for granting longer periods of leave and early
indefinite leave to remain
In October 2021 a concession was introduced to grant young adults longer periods
of leave and early indefinite leave to remain on the basis of private life.
This concession allowed a person who had arrived in the UK as a child to qualify for
settlement after 5 years if they had been granted leave on private life or family
grounds and had completed 5 years after the age of 18 with such leave. This
concession ended when it was incorporated into the Immigration Rules on 20 June
2022 along with the other changes set out in the Background section.
Transitional provisions
If you are considering an application made before 20 June 2022, you must do so
under the rules in force on 19 June 2022. You can find these rules, and the previous
casework guidance (Family life as a partner or parent, private life and exceptional
circumstances version 16 and Concession to the family Immigration Rules for
granting longer periods of leave and early indefinite leave to remain version 2), at the
following links:
• Archive: Immigration Rules
• Archive: Guidance
Other information about this guidance
Within this guidance there are links to the Migration and Borders guidance platform
that are shown as an ‘internal link’, otherwise links are to the same guidance
published on GOV.UK for external access.
Related content
Contents
Page 9 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Approach to children and young adults
The private life route is for a person wishing to stay in the UK because they have
spent a significant period of time in the UK and built a private life. Private life can be
established by a person who has spent time in the UK with or without lawful
permission and whilst it is normally a 10-year route to settlement, there are justifiable
exceptions.
The private life rules allow children and certain young people (who arrived in the UK
as children) who qualify for permission to stay on the basis of their private life to
settle in the UK after 5 years with permission. The relevant cohorts are:
• children who have been continuously resident in the UK for 7 years and it would
not be reasonable for them to leave
• a young adult (aged between 18 and under 25) who arrived in the UK as a child
and has spent at least half their life in the UK
Children and young people have a choice on the duration of their permission and
can choose to be granted for either 30 or 60 months. Adults granted permission to
stay under the private life rules can settle after 10 years continuous residence and
permission will be granted for 30 months.
The shorter and more generous route to settlement for children and young adults is
in line with the UK’s duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of a child when
carrying out immigration functions. The approach for those that arrived in the UK as
children recognises that these applicants did not make a conscious choice
themselves to move to the UK and are not responsible for any time spent in the UK
without permission as any applications to regularise their stay would have had to be
made by others on their behalf. In addition, those arriving as children and meeting
the private life rules are likely to have been educated in the UK, have well-developed
English language skills, and have integrated into life in the UK. The shorter, 5-year
route to settlement provides the child or young adult with necessary certainty and
security on their immigration status by bringing the waiting period in line with the
normal period for settlement elsewhere in the rules.
Considering applications from children on the basis of 7
years continuous residence in the UK
A child who has been resident in the UK for 7 years may be considered under the
private life rules if applying on their own or if applying as part of a family group.
In all family applications, you should check whether any children included in the
application have been resident in the UK for 7 years. If so, you will firstly need to
consider whether the child meets the continuous residence requirements under the
private life rules and if so, that it is not reasonable for the child to leave the UK. See
Child – 7 years continuous residence in the UK section below. The child’s family
relationships and whether they could leave the UK with other family members
(including any parents the child is applying with if applying as part of a family group),
Page 10 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
are relevant when considering whether it is reasonable for the child to leave the UK.
The remaining family members will be considered under Appendix FM if their basis
for remaining in the UK is based on their family life. You should consider the family
life guidance (internal link).
Where permission should be granted if a child meets both
Appendix Private Life and Appendix FM
If a child meets the requirements of the private life rules and their parent(s) meet the
family rules in Appendix FM, the child could also fall for a grant of permission under
Appendix FM as a dependent child (if they meet all other requirements). Where a
child meets both Appendix Private Life and Appendix FM, they should be granted
under Appendix Private Life as this gives the child the most favourable grant of leave
and allows a shorter route to settlement.
This may on occasion result in a child being granted a different length of leave and
different duration to settlement than their parent(s) or other family members.
Example 1 - A parent and child apply at the same time for permission to stay in the
UK under the family rules. The child has been in the UK continuously for 7 years and
was born outside the UK. The child should be considered under the private life rules
because of the duration of time they have spent in the UK. The parent should be
considered under the family rules if their reason for remaining in the UK is their
family life. The family guidance should be followed, and the parent considered under
the relevant parent rules as well as exceptional circumstances. If the child meets the
private life rules, they should be granted permission under Appendix Private Life. If
the parent meets the family rules, they should be granted permission under
Appendix FM. The child is not to be granted as a dependent of their parent under
Appendix FM.
Example 2 - A parent and 2 children apply at the same time for permission to stay in
the UK under the family rules. Child 1 has lived in the UK continuously for 8 years
and Child 2 has lived in the UK for 4 years. Neither child was born in the UK. Child 1
should be considered under the private life rules because of the duration of time they
have spent in the UK. The parent and Child 2 should be considered under the family
rules including exceptional circumstances under paragraph GEN.3.2., if their reason
for remaining in the UK is their family life. If Child 1 meets the private life rules, they
should be granted permission under Appendix Private Life. If the parent and Child 2
meet the family rules, they should be granted permission under Appendix FM. Child
1 is not to be granted as a dependent of their parent under Appendix FM.
Example 3 – A parent and child apply at the same time for permission to stay on the
basis of their private life. The parent has lived in the UK continuously for 20 years
and the child has lived in the UK for 7 years and was born outside the UK. Both
parent and child should initially be considered under the private life rules as they are
applying to stay on the basis of their private life and not on the basis of their family
relationships in the UK. If both applicants fail to meet the residence requirements (for
example, the caseworker found they had not been continuously resident), the
Page 11 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
caseworker must go on to consider whether refusal would breach Article 8 of the
ECHR under the private life rules.
Example 4 – Both parents and 2 children apply at the same time, as a family unit, for
permission to stay under the family rules. Child 1 has lived in the UK continuously for
7 years and Child 2 has lived in the UK for 3 years. Neither child was born in the UK.
Child 1 should be considered under the private life rules because of the duration of
time they have spent in the UK. Both parents and Child 2 should be considered
under the family rules including exceptional circumstances under paragraph
GEN.3.2., if the reason for remaining in the UK is their family life. If Child 1 meets the
private life rules, they should be granted permission under Appendix Private Life. If
both parents and Child 2 meet the family rules, they should be granted permission
under Appendix FM. The parents should both be granted as parents and Child 2
granted leave for the same period as their dependent. Child 1 is not to be granted as
a dependent of their parents under Appendix FM.
Dependent children born in the UK
Children who are born in the UK to a person who has permission or is seeking
permission on the private life route, can be added as a dependant in certain
circumstances. See Dependent children born in the UK to a person on the private life
route section below.
Where a person is applying for permission to stay in the UK on the basis of their
private life and they have a dependent child who was born in the UK, the child
should be considered under Appendix Private Life.
Related content
Contents
Page 12 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Burden and standard of proof, and
evidential flexibility
This section applies to all applications.
The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the eligibility
requirements of the Immigration Rules. The standard of proof is the balance of
probabilities (in other words, it is more likely than not that a requirement is met).
When applying the suitability requirements, the burden of proof sometimes shifts to
the Home Office (see Suitability guidance (internal link)).
In all cases you should apply the principles of evidential flexibility (see Evidential
flexibility guidance (internal link)).
Related content
Contents
Related external links
General grounds for refusal guidance (GOV.UK)
Page 13 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Validity
This section tells caseworkers how to assess whether an application for permission
to stay on the private life route is valid.
Overview
Before you consider an application or claim for permission to stay on the private life
route, you must check that it meets the validity requirements in paragraphs PL 1.1. to
PL 1.2. of Appendix Private Life.
The validity requirements in paragraphs PL 1.1. and PL 1.2. of Appendix Private Life
are that the applicant:
• has completed the specified application form on the GOV.UK website:
Application to remain in the UK on the basis of family life or private life
• has paid in full the application fee and the Immigration Health Charge unless
the applicant has been granted a fee waiver in whole or in part
• has given their biometric information, unless exempt – see Identity checks and
biometrics (internal link)
• has provided a passport or other travel document which satisfactorily
establishes their identity and nationality
• is in the UK on the date of application
More information on validity and the process for considering whether to reject an
invalid application can be found in the Validation, variation and withdrawal of
applications guidance (internal link).
Application does not meet all of the validity requirements
If the application does not meet all of the validity requirements set out in paragraphs
PL 1.1. and PL 1.2. the application is invalid and may be rejected and not
considered. This does not apply when considering certain Article 8 claims that do not
require a valid application – see below.
If the application is valid
If the application meets all of the validity requirements, or you have otherwise
decided to accept the application as valid, you must go on to consider whether it
meets the suitability and eligibility requirements for permission to stay.
Where a private life claim is being made under Article 8 of
the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
A person who makes a private life claim under Article 8 of the ECHR for one of the
reasons below is not required to complete the specified application form, pay the
application fee and Immigration Health Charge, or provide a passport or other
Page 14 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
document which satisfactorily establishes their identity and nationality, for
consideration under Appendix Private Life.
The validity requirement in paragraph PL 1.3. of Appendix Private Life waives those
requirements where the claim is made:
• at the same time as a protection claim or further submission in person after a
protection claim has been refused (see Further submissions guidance (internal
link) for details of when a further submission is considered)
• in detention (and the claim was submitted to a prison officer, custody officer or
a member of Home Office staff at the place of detention)
• during an appeal (subject to the consent of the Secretary of State where
applicable)
A valid application is also not required where the Secretary of State decides to
determine any Article 8 claim in the absence of such an application, for example
under paragraph 400 of Part 13 of the Immigration Rules where the person’s
removal from the UK is being considered.
Guidance on how to consider such cases is contained in the Family life as a partner
or parent guidance (internal link).
Related content
Contents
Related external links
Validation, variation and withdrawal of applications (GOV.UK)
Identity checks (GOV.UK)
Page 15 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Grounds for refusal - suitability
It is consistent with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
that applicants seeking permission to stay on private life grounds can be refused for
specified suitability reasons. The majority of suitability reasons are set out in
Appendix FM because private life and family life both come within the scope of
Article 8 ECHR. There is one suitability ground in Part 9 in relation to refusal based
on sham marriage.
The private life rules state that the applicant must not fall for refusal under the
suitability grounds for refusal as set out in the relevant rules in Appendix FM or Part
9. This means you must consider the application against those rules and come to a
decision on whether it falls to be refused under them. Care must be taken where the
suitability ground states that an application will ‘normally’ be refused – these are non-
mandatory grounds and caseworkers must ensure any reasons that justify not
normally refusing the application have been taken into account.
Before you grant permission to stay on the private life route, you must check the
applicant is suitable. The suitability requirements for:
• applicants are set out in paragraphs PL 2.1. and PL 2.2. of Appendix Private
Life
• dependent children born in the UK to a person on the private life route are set
out in paragraphs PL 20.1. and PL 20.2 of Appendix Private Life
To meet paragraph PL 2.1. or paragraph PL 20.1., you must check the applicant
does not fall for refusal under any of the grounds for refusal in paragraphs S-
LTR.1.2. to S-LTR.2.2. and S-LTR.3.1. to S-LTR.4.5. of Appendix FM.
The suitability requirements in Appendix FM fall into 3 categories:
• mandatory requirements – you must refuse an application if any of paragraphs
S-LTR.1.2. to S-LTR.1.8 apply
• non-mandatory requirements - you will normally refuse an application if
paragraph S-LTR.2.2. applies
• discretionary suitability grounds - you may refuse an application if any of
paragraphs S-LTR.4.2. to S-LTR.4.5. apply
To meet paragraph PL 2.2. or PL 20.2., you must check the applicant does not fall
for refusal under paragraph 9.6.1. of Part 9: grounds for refusal on the basis of a
sham marriage or civil partnership.
You may refuse an application if paragraph 9.6.1. applies.
When considering the suitability requirements in Appendix FM and Part 9 of the
Immigration Rules, you must refer to the following guidance:
• S-LTR.1.2.: Criminality in ECHR cases guidance
Page 16 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
• S-LTR.1.3., S-LTR.1.4.: Criminality guidance (internal link)
• S-LTR.1.5., S-LTR.1.6, S-LTR.1.8.: Suitability: non-conducive grounds for
refusal or cancellation of entry clearance or permission guidance (internal link)
• S-LTR.1.7.: Suitability: failure to provide required information, attend interview
(internal link)
• S-LTR.2.2., S-LTR.4.2., S-LTR.4.3.: Suitability: false representations (internal
link)
• S-LTR.4.4.: Suitability: unpaid litigation costs (internal link)
• S-LTR.4.5.: Suitability: debt to the NHS (internal link)
• Para 9.6.1.: Suitability: sham marriage or civil partnership (internal link)
Suitability requirements not met
Before refusing permission to stay on grounds of suitability you must consider
whether the applicant meets any of the eligibility requirements for permission to stay
set out in the private life rules. If the applicant fails to meet these eligibility criteria,
you must set out which and include this in the refusal letter.
You must also consider whether refusal of permission to stay would breach Article 8
of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) paragraphs PL 8.1. and PL
8.2. of Appendix Private Life.
Related content
Contents
Related external links
General grounds for refusal guidance (GOV.UK)
Page 17 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Child – 7 years continuous residence
in the UK
A child may be considered under the private life route when applying in their own
right or applying as part of a family. See Approach to children and young adults.
A child born in the UK who has been continuously resident in the UK for at least 7
years is eligible to apply for immediate settlement on the basis of private life. See the
settlement guidance for more information.
Residence requirements
To meet the residency requirements, the child must be under 18 years old and have
been continuously resident in the UK for 7 years on the date of application. You must
check the date the applicant applied for permission to stay and how old the applicant
was on that date.
You must assess whether the applicant has been continuously residence in the UK
for 7 years. Further information on continuous residence can be found in the
following section of this guidance below: Continuous residence.
Applying for extension of permission to stay
A person applying for an extension of permission on the private life route who was
initially granted permission under either Appendix private life or paragraph 276ADE
in Part 7 may no longer be under 18 at the date of application for an extension. The
applicant will be eligible to extend their permission to stay under PL 10.1 if they were
initially granted as a person who was under 18 years old with 7 years residency
when first granted permission to stay on the private life route.
Reasonable test
If the child meets the residence requirements, you must go on to consider whether it
is reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. You must carefully consider all the
information provided by the applicant, together with any other relevant information
that is available.
Assessing whether it is reasonable to expect a child to leave
the UK
The reasonable assessment must take place in every case where the child has
shown continuous residence for 7 years as a child. This is consistent with the
approach taken by the Court of Appeal in the case of AB Jamaica - Secretary of
State for the Home Department v AB (Jamaica) & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 661.
Page 18 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
The assessment must look at what is reasonable based on the child’s current
circumstances. This refers to the present state of affairs and not to the future. The
starting point is that we would not normally expect a qualifying child to leave the UK.
The assessment must be specific to the child’s situation. You must consider,
• the age of the child
• whether the child has ties to the UK including relationships with other family
and friends whose lives are established in the UK
• who the child would be expected to leave the UK with – it is normally in the best
interests of the child for the family to remain together
• whether they have family and friends in their country of return
• whether they have ever visited the country of return, for how long and when
A grant of permission to stay to a child on private life grounds does not mean any
parental permission to stay will be of the same duration.
Useful caselaw is: KO (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home
Department [2018] UKSC 53.
In this case the Supreme Court found that ‘reasonableness’ is to be considered in
the real-world context in which the child finds themselves. And so, if the
circumstances of a child’s parents are that both are going to leave the UK, it is
reasonable for the child to be treated as likely to leave with them, unless there is a
reasonable basis, supported by evidence, for not taking that view.
Young adult who arrived in the UK as a child
Residence requirements for a young adult
An applicant aged 18 years or over and under 25 years must have arrived in the UK
as a child and have lived continuously in the UK for at least half their life at the date
of application.
You must check the date of the permission to stay application, the age of the
applicant at the date of application and whether they had lived in the UK for at least
half their life.
For example, a person who is 24 years old and 6 months at date of application must
have arrived in the UK by the age of 12 years and 3 months old. If the applicant is
over 25 at the date the case is being considered, the application must not be refused
on this basis as it is only the age at date of application that is relevant.
The rationale for the half of life test is that the greater the proportion of a child or
young person’s life has been spent in the UK, the more likely it is that the child or
young person can be said to have established their own private life in the UK. Under
these rules if the residence requirement is not met as set out, then paragraph PL 8.1.
of Appendix Private Life requires an Article 8 consideration to take place.
Page 19 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Further information on continuous residence can be found in the following section of
this guidance below: Continuous residence.
Applications for extension of permission to stay as a young
person
A person applying for an extension of permission on the private life route who was
initially granted permission under either Appendix Private Life or paragraph 276ADE
in Part 7 may no longer be in the young person age bracket (for example, they may
be 25 or over) at the date of application. The applicant will be eligible to extend their
permission to stay under PL 10.2 if they were initially granted as a person who was
18 or over but under 25 years old and met the half of life test when first granted
permission to stay on the private life route.
Further consideration
Those individuals who arrived as children and are applying over the age of 18, but
do not meet the requirement of having lived in the UK for at least half of their life may
still qualify. They may wish to apply as an adult who has lived continuously in the UK
for less than 20 years and will need to demonstrate there would be very significant
obstacles to their integration into the country where they would have to live if
required to leave the UK. They will not be eligible though if they have lodged a
protection or asylum claim which has been declared inadmissible.
Related content
Contents
Page 20 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Adult private life applications
Residence requirements for an adult
Private life is normally established over a period of time in a particular country and
means that the majority of a person’s important relationships are in that country.
Since private life is normally established over a period of time, the period of
residence in the UK is particularly important as a measure of that private life.
An applicant over 18 years of age, who does not meet the half-life test, must have
lived continuously in the UK for at least 20 years at the date of application (subject to
the below).
Further information on continuous residence can be found in the following section of
this guidance: Continuous residence.
Less than 20 years residence
Where an adult applicant has been resident in the UK for less than 20 years (and is
not a young adult who meets the half of life test) there must be very significant
obstacles to the applicant’s integration into the country where they would have to live
if required to leave the UK in order for them to qualify under the private life route.
Assessing whether there are ‘very significant obstacles to
integration’ into the country of return
This guidance explains how this applies to an individual who is an adult and then
how to take account of an adult who arrived in the UK as a child.
When assessing whether there are ‘very significant obstacles to integration into the
country to which they would have to go if required to leave the UK’, the starting point
for someone who has lived outside the UK as an adult is to assume that the
applicant will be able to integrate into their country of proposed return. In such a
case the burden of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate that in his or her case
there are now very significant obstacles to that integration.
A ‘very significant obstacle to integration’ means something which would prevent or
seriously inhibit the applicant from integrating into the country of return. You are
looking for more than the usual obstacles which may arise on relocation (such as the
need to learn a new language or obtain employment). You are looking to see
whether there are ‘very significant’ obstacles, which is a high threshold. Very
significant obstacles will exist where the applicant demonstrates that they would be
unable to establish a private life in the country of return, or if establishing a private
life in the country of return would entail very serious hardship for the applicant.
You should expect to see independent and verifiable documentary evidence of any
claims made in this regard and must place less weight on assertions which are
Page 21 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
unsubstantiated. Where it is not reasonable to expect corroborating evidence to be
provided, you must consider the credibility of the applicant’s claims.
The assessment of whether there are very significant obstacles to integration will
generally consider the proposed country of return, unless there is information to
suggest that the applicant might have a choice about where they choose to relocate
to, such as where they have a right to reside in a country other than the country of
proposed return, or where they have more than one nationality. In that case you can
take account of whether there are very significant obstacles to integration continuing
in any of the relevant countries.
Relevant country information (internal link) should be referred to when assessing
whether there are very significant obstacles to integration. You should consider the
specific claim made and the relevant national laws, attitudes and country situation in
the relevant country or regions. A very significant obstacle may arise where the
applicant would be at a real risk of prosecution or significant harassment or
discrimination as a result of their sexual or political orientation or faith or gender, or
where their rights and freedoms would otherwise be so severely restricted as to
affect their fundamental rights, and therefore their ability to establish a private life in
that country.
You should consider whether the applicant has the ability to form an adequate
private life by the standards of the country of return – not by UK standards. You will
need to consider whether the applicant will be able to establish a private life in
respect of all its essential elements, even if, for example, their job, or their ability to
find work, or their network of friends and relationships may be differently constituted
in the country of return.
The fact the applicant may find life difficult or challenging in the country of return
does not mean that they have established that there would be very significant
obstacles to integration there. You must consider all relevant factors in the person’s
background and the conditions they are likely to face in the country of return in
making their decision as to whether there are very significant obstacles to
integration.
You will need to consider any specific obstacles raised by the applicant. These
obstacles will need to be assessed individually as well as accumulatively. While
individual factors may be insufficient alone, several factors considered together “in
the round” may create a very significant obstacle to integration outside the UK.
When considering relevant obstacles or factors, those in favour of an individual’s
integration on return should be balanced against those factors raised as obstacles in
order to make a complete assessment in the individual case. Relevant factors to
consider include the following.
Cultural background
It will be important to consider any evidence of the applicant’s cultural ties and
familiarity with the country of return. Where the person has spent time in the UK
living amongst a diaspora community from that country, then it may be reasonable to
Page 22 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
conclude they have cultural ties with that country even if they have never lived there
or have been absent from that country for a lengthy period. If the applicant has
cultural ties with the country of return, then it is likely that it would be possible for
them to establish a private life there. Even if there are no cultural ties, the cultural
norms of that country may be such that there are no barriers to integration.
Length of time spent in the country of return
Where the applicant has spent a significant period of time in the country of return it
will be difficult for them to demonstrate there would be very significant obstacles to
integration into that country. You must consider the proportion of the person’s life
spent in that country and the stage of life the person was at when in that country.
Family, friends and social network
An applicant who has family or friends in the country of return should be able to turn
to them for support to help them to integrate into that country. You must consider
whether the applicant or their family have sponsored or hosted visits to the UK by
family or friends from the country of return, or whether the applicant has visited
family or friends in the country of return. You must consider the quality of any
relationships with family or friends in the country of return, but they do not have to be
strong familial ties and can include ties that could be strengthened if the person were
to return.
Faith, political or sexual orientation or gender identity
You must consider the relevant country information when considering whether an
applicant would face very significant obstacles integrating or re-integrating into the
country of return as a result of their faith, political or sexual orientation or gender
identity. You must consider the degree of difficulty that would be faced as a result of
the applicant’s faith, political or sexual orientation or gender identity based on the
situation in practice in the country of return and not necessarily solely what is
provided for in law. The applicant’s previous experience of life in that country and
any difficulties the applicant claims to have experienced as a result of their faith,
political or sexual orientation or gender identity must also be considered.
Common claims
Applicant has no friends or family members in the country of return:
• where there are no family, friends, or social networks in the country of return
that is not in itself a very significant obstacle to integration - many people
successfully migrate to countries where they have no existing ties
• if there are particular circumstances in the applicant’s case which mean they
would need assistance to integrate it will also be relevant to consider whether
there are any organisations in the country of return which may be able to assist
with integration
Applicant has never lived in the country of return or only spent early years there:
Page 23 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
• if an applicant has never lived in the country of return, or only spent their early
years there, this will not necessarily mean that there are very significant
obstacles preventing them from integrating particularly if they can speak a
language of that country, for example if the country of return is one where
English is spoken or if a language of the country was spoken at home when
they were growing up - for these purposes, fluency is not required –
conversational level language skills or a basic level of language which could be
improved on return, would be sufficient - the cultural norms of the country and
how easy it is for the person to adapt to them will also be relevant
Applicant cannot speak any language spoken in the country of return:
• where there is credible evidence that an applicant cannot speak any language
which is spoken in the country of return, this will not in itself be a very
significant obstacle to integration, especially if the applicant will be returning
with or joining family members, unless they can also show that they would be
unable to learn a language of that country, for example because of a mental or
physical disability
Applicant would have no employment prospects on return:
• lack of employment prospects is very unlikely to be a very significant obstacle
to integration - in assessing a claim that an absence of employment prospects
would prevent an applicant from integrating in the country of return, their
circumstances on return should be compared to the conditions that prevail in
that country and to the circumstances of the general population, not to their
circumstances in the UK
Less weight should be given to generalised claims about country conditions that
have not been particularised to take account of the applicant’s individual
circumstances.
Private life in the UK
The nature and extent of the private life that an individual has established in the UK
is not relevant when you are considering whether there are very serious obstacles to
integration into the country of return. However, the existence of a private life in the
UK and its strength will be relevant should the applicant fall for refusal under the
rules, when you move on to consider whether refusal would breach Article 8 of the
Human Rights Convention. See section: Eligibility requirement for private life route
relying on Article 8 of the Human Rights Convention in this guidance.
Assessing very significant obstacles into the country of return if
the applicant arrived in the UK as a child
If the applicant is over 18 but arrived in the UK as a child (and does not meet the half
of life in the UK test) then an assessment of whether there are very significant
obstacles to integration in the country in which they might have to live if required to
Page 24 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
leave the UK will be necessary. In these cases, you must consider if the individual
has lived in that country as an adult which will mean spending a period of
employment or study in that country, or other activities consistent with living there as
an adult.
Private life applicants who have made a protection or asylum
claim that is inadmissible or might be inadmissible
If an applicant has made an asylum claim which has been declared inadmissible
under Part 11 of the Immigration Rules before 28 June 2022 or section 80B and 80C
of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 and continues to be treated as
such, the applicant is excluded from meeting the requirement to show significant
obstacles to their integration into the country where they would have to live if
required to leave the UK. This is set out at PL 6.1.
You must check both CID and Atlas to determine if the applicant has made an
asylum claim and is being caseworked by the Third Country Unit. You must check
whether a claim has been refused or recorded as inadmissible on third country
grounds or if there are entries showing that action has been taken, is ongoing or
awaited.
If the third country claim has been refused or recorded as inadmissible, the applicant
cannot be granted private life on the basis that they have very significant obstacles
to integration into the country they would have to live if required to leave the UK.
If the third country action is ongoing or a decision is pending, the decision on the
private life application should not be made until the third country action has been
concluded.
If the caseworking system shows an inadmissibility decision was originally made but
the claim has since been admitted, the applicant is not excluded from a grant of
leave under private life rules if they meet the eligibility requirements.
You should refer to the Inadmissibility: third country cases (internal link) guidance for
information on when a protection or asylum claim has been declared inadmissible.
Related content
Contents
Page 25 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Continuous residence
Continuous residence for permission to stay on the private life route means time
spent in the UK for an unbroken period and includes time spent in the UK with or
without permission. You must check when the applicant arrived in the UK and how
long they have been living in the UK.
Time spent in prison will not be counted towards the period of continuous residence,
but time before and after that imprisonment can be counted. You must check the
case working system to see whether the applicant has a criminal history and, if so
whether they have been sentenced to a period of imprisonment.
Continuous residence has been broken if any of the following apply:
• the applicant has been absent from the UK for more than 6 months at any one
time
• the applicant has spent a total of 550 days or more absent from the UK during
the period of continuous residence
• the applicant has been removed, deported, or has left the UK having had an
application for permission to enter or stay in the UK refused
• the applicant left the UK with no reasonable expectation at the time of leaving
that they would lawfully be able to return
Calculating absences for continuous residence
The applicant is asked to list any absences in the Immigration History section of the
application form. You must check the copy of the applicant’s documentation such as
passport pages or travel documents for a record of absences to see if the evidence
supports the information on the application form.
If the applicant has not listed all the dates of absence on the form but the passport
evidence or other records to demonstrate they were absent, you must ask for more
information to clarify this discrepancy.
Follow the missing or inadequate evidence section of this guidance for more
information.
It is possible for absences to be overlooked or forgotten so you must give the
applicant an opportunity to confirm and rectify the dates with you.
In this case you should ask the applicant if they can confirm their dates of absences.
If the applicant insists there was no absence for the dates in question, you can
mention that you see documents on record to show they were outside of the country.
You must also check the case working system to see if the applicant has been
removed or deported.
Page 26 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Assessing the evidence
This section explains what to consider when assessing evidence of continuous
residence.
To demonstrate length of residence in the UK, applicants will be asked to provide
documentary evidence as part of the application form.
There is no specified evidence to show continuous residence so you cannot refuse
an application for a lack of a particular document but must consider where you are
overall satisfied that the applicant has been continually resident for the relevant
period.
There is also no set number of documents required to show continuous residence
and the evidence submitted will depend on the circumstances of the applicant.
You must carefully consider the information on the application form and other
available evidence before deciding whether you are satisfied that the continuous
residence requirement is met. Official documentary evidence from official or
independent sources, that shows ongoing contact over a period of time, will be given
more weight in the decision-making process than evidence of one-off events.
Below is a non-exhaustive list of evidence that may be submitted by an applicant to
show continuous residence in the UK. The list is not in order of importance:
• tenancy agreement, mortgage agreement, letter from landlord, documents of
ownership deeds or letter from housing trust
• temporary work contracts or employment letters
• letter from a local authority – contact with child or school placements
• utility bills – council tax, electricity, gas, water etc
• other bills – phone, TV licence, cable etc
• other dated UK addressed domestic bills – for example, veterinary bills or home
services/repairs
• bank statements
• study course documents
• letters from school or charitable organisations
Although the burden of proof is on the applicant, if they have not yet provided you
with sufficient evidence, you should consider whether you should ask them for
further information, or you can seek to verify evidence before deciding the
application.
Burden and standard of proof
The applicant must show that they meet the continuous residence requirement. If
you do not consider that a period in the UK counts as continuous residence the
burden of proof is on the Home Office. The standard of proof is the balance of
probabilities (it is more likely than not).
Page 27 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
If the applicant provides evidence which you do not accept is genuine, the burden of
proof is then on you to show that it is more likely than not that the evidence is not
genuine. In such cases, you should also consider the Suitability: false
representations guidance (internal link).
Format of evidence
There is no specific format requirement for most documents. This doesn’t mean that
format is irrelevant – it will help you assess if a piece of evidence is genuine and if it
provides the information you need to be satisfied requirements are met. But it does
mean you must not refuse an application because the evidence is not in a particular
format.
If evidence does not include the information you would normally expect, you should
consider whether to take further action to verify it.
Where evidence is missing or inadequate
The applicant will be told what evidence to provide as part of the application process.
However, sometimes evidence is missing or inadequate.
If evidence is missing or inadequate, but you do not need the information because
you can get it elsewhere, for example, from a previous application, you do not need
to contact the applicant.
If evidence is missing or inadequate but receiving it would make no difference to
your decision (for example because they would still be refused for other reasons)
you do no need to contact the applicant.
If the evidence is missing or inadequate and you think receiving it would make a
difference to your decision, you should consider asking for further information or
making verification checks. For example, you may want to ask for evidence in the
following situations:
• evidence is missing that you believe the applicant has or could obtain
• evidence is inadequate but could be clarified
You may decide to ask for further information from the applicant or make verification
checks. For more information see the Evidential flexibility guidance (internal link).
Eligibility requirement for private life route relying on
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
If the applicant does not meet the suitability requirements (see Grounds for refusal -
suitability) or the eligibility requirements for a child, young person or adult, you must
go on to consider whether refusal would breach Article 8 (the right to respect for
private and family life) of the ECHR on the basis of private life.
Page 28 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
In conducting this assessment, you must have regard to all of the information and
evidence provided by the applicant. You must take into account, as a primary
consideration, the best interests of a relevant child.
You must consider whether refusal would result in a harsh outcome or outcomes for
the applicant, which is not justified by the public interest, including in maintaining
effective immigration controls, preventing burdens on the taxpayer, promoting
integration, and protecting the public and the rights and freedoms of others.
The impact on the applicant if the application is refused must be considered and an
assessment made as to whether this produces an unduly harsh outcome when the
factors in the preceding paragraph are taken into account. It is expected that an
individual applying on their own under the private life rules will be assessed on that
basis without wishing for the impact on family life or family members to be taken into
account.
If family members are included in the application, then the other family members
must be taken into account and the application considered so as to produce the
same result as if considered under GEN.3.2. of Appendix FM.
Relevant factors include:
• serious cultural barriers to relocation overseas - this might be relevant in
situations where a person would be so disadvantaged by the social, religious,
or cultural situation in a particular country that they could not be expected to
live there - such a barrier must be one which affects their fundamental rights,
cannot reasonably be overcome, and would present a very serious obstacle:
o in so doing, you should consider the situation in practice and not just what is
provided for in law - so, the fact that a country has a law which criminalises
same sex sexual acts would not be sufficient to show that a homosexual
applicant would face very significant hardship living in that country if the
authorities in practice do not prosecute cases and there is no real risk of
prosecution or persecution
• the impact of a mental or physical disability or of a serious illness which
requires ongoing medical treatment - living in or moving to another country
may involve a period of hardship for any person as they adjust to their new
surroundings, whether or not they have a mental or physical disability or a
serious illness which requires ongoing medical treatment - but independent
medical evidence could establish that a physical or mental disability, or a
serious illness which requires ongoing medical treatment, would lead to very
serious hardship: for example, due to the lack of adequate health care in the
country where the applicant would be required to continue or resume living - as
such, refusal of permission to stay could result in a breach of Article 8
• the absence of governance or security in another country - in some
circumstances, for example where civil society has broken down as a result of
conflict or natural disaster (and such breakdown extends to the country as a
whole), requiring an individual to commence living there may give rise to very
serious hardship that renders refusal unjustifiably harsh - Foreign Office travel
advice should not normally be referred to, as that is generally aimed at tourists
choosing to visit a country for specific purposes and a limited period - rather,
Page 29 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
you should consider the relevant country information and guidance in relation to
the country or countries in which the applicant could lawfully reside
• the immigration status of the applicant - you should take into account the
circumstances of the applicant’s entry to and stay in the UK and the proportion
of the time they have been in the UK legally as opposed to illegally - did they
establish their right to an Article 8 consideration at a time when they were in the
UK unlawfully? Article 8 rights formed in the knowledge that a person’s stay
here is unlawful should be given less weight (when weighed against the public
interest in their removal) than rights formed by a person lawfully present in the
UK. Is the applicant in the UK as a visitor, meaning that they have undertaken
to leave the UK at the end of their visit as a condition of their visit visa or leave
to enter?
Cumulative factors should be considered. Cumulative factors weighing in favour of
the applicant should be balanced against cumulative factors weighing in the public
interest in deciding whether refusal would breach Article 8 for the applicant.
Examples of circumstances which are not likely to bring about a breach Article 8
include:
• lack of knowledge of a language spoken in the country in which the applicant
would be required to live - although inability to speak the language of that
country may cause difficulties, it is very unlikely to amount to a breach of Article
8 as many people successfully move to a country where, at first, they do not
speak the language
• being separated from extended family members, such as where the parents or
siblings of the applicant or their partner live in the UK, unless there are
particular factors in the case to establish the unusual or exceptional
dependency required for Article 8 to be engaged
• a material change in the quality of life for the applicant in the country in which
they would be required to live, such as the type of accommodation they would
live in, or a reduction in their income or standard of living, unless this would
lead to particular hardship or there were particular exceptional factors in the
case
The best interests of a relevant child
You must take into account, as a primary consideration, the best interests of any
‘relevant child’.
A ‘relevant child’ is a child in the UK or overseas, who is under the age of 18 years at
the date of application, and who it is evident from the information provided by the
applicant would be affected by a decision to refuse the application.
The Supreme Court determined, in ZH (Tanzania) [2011] UKSC 4, that the ‘best
interests of the child’ broadly means their well-being and that in undertaking a
proportionality assessment under Article 8 those best interests must be a primary
consideration. However, they are not necessarily determinative, and they can be
outweighed by public interest considerations. The Court also noted that while British
Page 30 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
citizenship is not a ‘trump card’, it is of particular importance in assessing the best
interests of a child.
In FZ (Congo) [2013] UKSC 74, the Supreme Court said:
“...The best interests of a child are an integral part of the proportionality
assessment under Article 8 of the Convention; in making that assessment, the
best interests of a child must be a primary consideration, although not always the
only primary consideration; and the child’s best interests do not of themselves
have the status of paramount consideration...”.
How to consider the best interests of a relevant child
In considering the best interests of a relevant child as a primary consideration within
the Article 8 decision-making process, what matters is the substance of the attention
given to the overall well-being of the child, not the specific order in which the
elements of the consideration take place.
It is also essential that the child is not blamed for any failure by their parent or
parents to comply with UK immigration controls. The conduct or immigration history
of their non-British citizen parent or parents is relevant to the public interest analysis
and must be given due weight in determining the overall proportionality of the
decision under ECHR Article 8, but it does not affect the assessment of the child’s
best interests or the need for those best interests to be taken into account as a
primary consideration in the Article 8 decision.
The assessment of a child’s best interests requires a consideration of all relevant
factors in the particular case. You should consider:
• the child’s length of residence in the UK
• the family circumstances in which the child is living
• the child’s relationships with their parent or parents overseas and in the UK
• how long the child has been in education and what stage their education has
reached
• the child’s health
• the child’s connection with the country outside the UK in which their parents
are, or one of their parents is, currently living or where the child is likely to live if
their parents leave the UK
• the extent to which the decision will interfere with, or impact on, the child’s
family or private life
• whether (and, if so, to what extent) the child will have linguistic, medical, or
other difficulties in adapting to life in that country
• whether there are any factors affecting the child’s well-being which can only be
alleviated by the presence of the applicant in the UK
• what effective and material contribution the applicant’s presence in the UK
would make to safeguarding and promoting the child’s well-being. Is this
significant in nature?
• support during or following a major medical procedure, especially if this is likely
to lead to a permanent change in the child’s life
Page 31 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Related content
Contents
Page 32 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Decision
Granting permission to stay on the private life route
If the applicant meets the suitability requirements of PL.8.2. and the eligibility
requirements on residence, the applicant will be granted permission to stay.
If the applicant does not meet the suitability requirements at 9.6.1 of Part 9 S-LTR
1.7, S-LTR 2.2, S-LTR 3.1 to S-LTR 4.5 of Appendix FM or does not meet the
eligibility requirements on residence but refusal would breach Article 8 under PL 8.1,
the applicant will be granted permission to stay.
Child or young person
If this is the applicant’s first grant of permission on the private life route and they are
a child (under 18 at the date of application) or a young person (aged between 18 and
24 at date of application and meets the half of life test) the applicant will be able to
choose whether they have 30 or 60 months leave.
An applicant who was initially granted permission as a child or young person either
under Appendix Private Life or under paragraphs 276BE(1) or 276BE(2) of Part 7
and is extending their permission to stay will also be able to choose whether they are
granted 30 or 60 months leave. As the applicant is extending their leave, they may
no longer be a child (for example, they may be over 18) or young person (for
example, they may be over 25) at the date of application but they must have met the
relevant age criteria when they were first granted leave on the private life route.
You must check what length of leave the applicant has requested on the application
form and that the applicant is entitled to choose their leave. You must check that
Atlas has correctly recorded the expiry date of leave for that applicant on the
decision screen, and if not, enter the correct expiry date.
Private life claims – no application required
Children and young people being granted permission on the private life route
following a private life claim for which no application was required (see section
Where a private life claim is being made under Article 8 of the Human Rights
Convention of this guidance) will be granted leave for 60-months. Children and
young people will be on a 5-year route to settlement.
Adults
All other applicants granted permission on the private life route will be granted leave
for 30-months.
Page 33 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Extension of stay
If the applicant is being granted further permission to stay on the private life route,
any remaining period of permission to stay on the basis of private life at the date of
application, up to a maximum of 28 days, will be added to the period of leave being
granted under paragraph PL 10.1., PL 10.2. or PL 10.3.
Choice on duration of leave and the Immigration Health
Surcharge
Children and young people who meet the half of life test have a choice on the
duration of leave granted. They can choose either 30 or 60 months leave. The
applicant will have self-identified as part of the application process whether they are
currently a child or young person or were a child a young person when first granted
leave on the basis of their private life. The cost of an application under the private life
rules is the same irrespective of the length of permission required but the cost of the
immigration health surcharge is different based on the length of leave requested.
The applicant will have paid the relevant immigration health surcharge cost at point
of application.
Only children and young people are entitled to choose the duration of leave under
the private life rules. The Immigration Health Charge portal will allow any applicant in
the UK applying on the private or family life routes to select the duration of their
leave. Whilst there is clear messaging on GOV.UK on which cohorts are eligible to
select their leave, some applicants will wrongly self-select.
Approach where the applicant has wrongly self-identified they
are entitled to choose their duration of leave
If the applicant has requested 60 months leave but they are not entitled (as they are
not a child or young person who met the half of life test or were not a child or young
person who met the half of life test when first granted leave on the private life route),
they are entitled to a refund of a proportion of the immigration health surcharge. The
applicant only needs to pay the Immigration Health Charge for the period of leave
they are granted.
The Immigration Health Charge portal and the caseworking system needs to be
updated to process and record the refund. The applicant will then receive an
automatic refund.
You must read the Immigration health surcharge guidance (internal link) and follow
instructions on processing a refund where a person has been granted a lesser period
of leave.
Page 34 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Approach where a child or young person has requested 60
months leave but not paid the required fee
If a child or young person has selected that they would like 60 months leave on the
application form but has only paid the immigration health surcharge fee for 30
months, you must write out to ask the applicant to make an immigration health
surcharge top-up payment within 2 weeks in order to be granted 60 months. If they
do not make the payment within the 2 weeks, they should be granted 30 months
leave.
Approach where a child included in a family application is to be
granted leave on the private life route
Family life applicants pay the immigration surcharge (or are given a fee waiver) for
30 months permission to stay. If a child is to be granted leave on the private life
route, you must write out to inform the applicant that they are eligible for 60 months
and ask them for an immigration health surcharge top-up payment in order to be
granted 60 months. If they do not make the payment within the 2 weeks, they should
be granted 30 months leave.
Refusing permission to stay on the private life route
If the applicant does not meet all the suitability and eligibility requirements and
refusal would not breach Article 8 of the Human Rights Convention, the application
on the private life route must be refused.
If the applicant falls for refusal under suitability paragraphs S-LTR.1.2., S-LTR.1.3.,
S-LTR.1.4., S-LTR.1.5., S-LTR.1.6 or S-LTR 1.8. of Appendix FM but refusal would
breach Article 8 under PL 8.2, the application on the private life route must be
refused.
You should refer to the suitability guidance when considering each suitability
paragraph:
• S-LTR.1.2., S-LTR.1.3., S-LTR.1.4. and S-LTR.1.5: see Criminality (internal
link)
• S-LTR.1.5. and S-LTR.1.6.: see Non conducive (internal link)
• S-LTR.1.8.: see Suitability: Exclusion from Asylum or Humanitarian Protection
(internal link)
Where a person has a custodial sentence and is in the UK, they may meet the
threshold for deportation. You must refer the case to the Foreign National Offender
(FNO) Returns Command for them to consider whether to pursue deportation. You
should also refer the case to FNO Returns Command where there is a live
deportation order.
In circumstances where there is an established ECHR barrier to deportation and
FNO Returns Command have confirmed they do not have a continued interest in
Page 35 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
pursuing deportation because of this barrier, consideration of a grant of leave outside
the rules for 30 months on Article 8 grounds may be granted for the above suitability
grounds, except S-LTR.1.8. The conditions of stay are the same as those for a grant
of permission to stay on the basis of private life.
For applicants falling for refusal under S-LTR.1.8. with an ECHR barrier to removal
or deportation, consideration should be given to Restricted leave (internal link).
Potential restricted leave referrals must be emailed to Special Cases General
Enquiries and to Criminality Policy.
Right of appeal
If the application is refused the person can exercise their right of appeal against that
decision under Part 5 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. See
Rights of Appeal guidance (internal link).
Conditions of stay
Employment
Persons granted permission to stay on the basis of private life can take any kind of
employment or self-employment. The work can be full-time or part-time, paid, or
unpaid and they do not need any additional permission or endorsement from the
Home Office to work.
Study
Subject to the Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) condition below,
persons granted permission to stay on the basis of private life are allowed to study in
the UK. There is no limit on the number of hours they can study or level of course
they can do.
If the person intends to study a discipline listed in Immigration Rules: Appendix
ATAS and they are not a national of an exempt country, they must obtain an
Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) clearance certificate from the
Counter-Proliferation and Arms Control Centre of the Foreign, Commonwealth and
Development Office in relation to this course before beginning their study.
Access to public funds
Where you are granting on the basis of private life, you must consider whether to
grant permission to stay with access to public funds.
You must grant access to public funds where the applicant has provided satisfactory
evidence that:
• they are destitute or at risk of imminent destitution
• there are reasons relating to the welfare of a relevant child which outweigh any
reasons for not allowing access
Page 36 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
• they are facing exceptional financial circumstances relating to their income or
expenditure
You may need to make further enquiries to establish whether the above criteria have
been met.
When deciding whether to allow access to public funds, the best interests of a
relevant child must be treated as a primary consideration.
A ‘relevant child’ means a person who both:
• is under the age of 18 years at the date of application
• it is clear from the information provided by the applicant, is a child who would
be affected by a decision to impose or maintain the no recourse to public funds
condition
Where the above criteria have not been met, you must not grant access to public
funds.
For detailed guidance on assessing when to grant access to public funds see:
Access to public funds within family, private life and Hong Kong BN(O) routes
(internal link).
Related content
Contents
Page 37 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Dependent children born in the UK to a
person on the private life route
This section tells you how to assess an application for permission to stay as a
dependent child born in the UK to a person on the private life route.
Validity requirements
Before considering suitability and eligibility, you must check the application is valid.
The validity requirements in paragraphs PL 19.1. to PL 19.3. of Appendix Private Life
are that the applicant:
• has completed the specified application form on the GOV.UK website:
Application to remain in the UK on the basis of family life or private life
• has paid in full the application fee and the Immigration Health Charge unless
the applicant has been granted a fee waiver in whole or in part
• has given their biometric information, unless exempt – see Identity checks and
biometrics (internal link)
• has provided a passport or other travel document which satisfactorily
establishes their identity and nationality
• must have been born in the UK
• must be applying as a child of a person on the private life route where one of
the following applies. The person:
o has made a valid application for permission to stay in the UK on the private
life route that has not been decided
o has permission to stay on the private life route
o is settled or has become a British citizen, providing they had permission to
stay on the private life route when they settled, and the applicant was born
before they settled
• must be in the UK on the date of application
• must be aged under 18 at the date of application
If you are not satisfied the application meets all the validity requirements, you should
consider whether to request more information, reject the application or proceed to
consider. See section Validity requirements for permission to stay of this guidance
for more information.
A person who makes a private life claim under Article 8 of the European Convention
on Human Rights (ECHR) for one of the reasons below is not required to complete
the specified application form, pay the application fee and Immigration Health
Charge, or provide a passport or other document which satisfactorily establishes
their identity and nationality, for consideration under Appendix Private Life.
The validity requirement in paragraph PL 19.4. of Appendix Private Life waives those
requirements where the claim is made:
Page 38 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
• at the same time as a protection claim or further submission in person after a
protection claim has been refused (see Further submissions guidance (internal
link) for details of when a further submission is considered)
• during an appeal (subject to the consent of the Secretary of State where
applicable)
A valid application is also not required where the Secretary of State decides to
determine any Article 8 claim in the absence of such an application, for example
under paragraph 400 of Part 13 of the Immigration Rules where the person’s
removal from the UK is contemplated.
See the Where a private life claim is being made under Article 8 of the Human Rights
Convention section of this guidance.
Suitability requirements
Before you grant permission to stay on the private life route, you must check the
applicant is suitable. The suitability requirements for dependent children born in the
UK to a person on the private life route are set out in paragraphs PL 20.1. and PL
20.2 of Appendix Private Life.
To meet paragraph PL 20.1., you must check the applicant does not fall for refusal
under any of the grounds for refusal in paragraphs S-LTR.1.2. to S-LTR.2.2. and S-
LTR.3.1. to S-LTR.4.5. of Appendix FM. See section Suitability for permission to stay
on the private life route of this guidance.
Eligibility requirements
Relationship
If this is the applicant’s first application for permission to stay, having been born in
the UK, they must provide a full birth certificate.
If the birth certificate has been accepted on a previous application, it does not need
to be provided again.
You must be satisfied the applicant meets the relationship requirements in
paragraphs PL 21.1. and PL 21.2.
At the date of application, the applicant must be the child of someone who either:
• has permission on the basis of their private life
• is being granted permission on the private life route
• is already settled (or a British citizen), as long as when the parent settled they
had permission on the private life route and the applicant was born before they
settled
Page 39 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
You must carefully consider the information on the application form and other
available evidence before deciding that the applicant meets the relationship
requirements.
Other parent’s immigration status
The other parent of a child born in the UK to a person with permission on the private
life route must have permission to be in the UK (other than as a visitor) unless one of
the following applies:
• the parent with permission is the sole surviving parent
• the parent with permission has sole responsibility for the child’s upbringing
• the parent who does not have permission is a British citizen or a person who
has a right to enter or stay in the UK without restriction (and who therefore
would not apply for permission) - such persons must, however, be (or will be)
ordinarily resident in the UK
• you are satisfied there are serious and compelling reasons to grant the child
permission to stay with the parent with permission
Using the information provided on the application form you can check and confirm
the permission the other parent holds and the date of expiry on the caseworker
system. If the other parent is a British citizen or settled in the UK, the applicant will
have declared this on the application form.
Assessing sole responsibility
To assess sole responsibility, refer to the family life (as a partner or parent) and
exceptional circumstances guidance:
• Family life (as a partner or parent) and exceptional circumstances (internal)
• Family life (as a partner or parent) and exceptional circumstances (external)
Assessing serious and compelling reasons
While you should normally be satisfied that both parents have permission (other than
as a visitor), or the parent with leave on the private life route is the sole surviving
parent, or has and has had sole responsibility, there may be exceptional cases
where it is appropriate to grant permission to stay. For example, where the other
parent is overseas and restricted from travelling to the UK. When the other parent is
in the UK unlawfully you must give careful consideration to whether there are serious
and compelling reasons to grant permission. You must consider who the child is
living with, the role the other parent takes in their upbringing and any healthcare
considerations.
Care requirement
You must be satisfied the applicant will be living in a suitable care arrangement that
meets relevant UK legislation.
Page 40 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
All arrangements for children's care and accommodation in the UK must comply with
relevant UK legislation and regulations.
You must also consider your duty in section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and
Immigration Act 2009 to have regard to the need to safeguard and promote the
welfare of children aged under 18. If you have concerns over child welfare you
should discuss the application with a senior caseworker.
Decision
Granting permission to stay on the private life route
If the applicant meets all of the suitability and eligibility requirements the applicant
must be granted permission to stay.
Duration of leave
The applicant will be granted permission to stay which ends on the same date as
whichever of their parents’ permission ends first. For example, if the parent on the
private life route is being granted permission (or has permission) to 31 December
2024 and the other parent has permission to 13 July 2023, the child will be granted
permission to 13 July 2023.
If the applicant’s other parent is a British citizen or a person who has a right to enter
or stay in the UK without restriction and is or will be ordinarily resident in the UK, the
applicant will be granted permission to stay which ends on the same date as the
parent on the private life route.
Refusing permission to stay on the private life route
If the applicant does not meet all the suitability and eligibility requirements, the
application on the private life route must be refused.
The applicant does not need to be considered against the main private life rules if
falling for refusal as a dependent child born in the UK.
Right of appeal
If the application is refused the person can exercise their right of appeal against that
decision under Part 5 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. See
Rights of Appeal guidance (internal link).
Conditions of stay
Employment
Persons granted permission to stay on the basis of private life can take any kind of
employment or self-employment. The work can be full-time or part-time, paid, or
Page 41 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
unpaid and they do not need any additional permission or endorsement from the
Home Office to work.
Study
Subject to the Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) condition below,
persons granted permission to stay on the basis of private life are allowed to study in
the UK. There is no limit on the number of hours they can study or level of course
they can do.
If the person intends to study a discipline listed in Immigration Rules: Appendix
ATAS and they are not a national of an exempt country, they must obtain an
Academic Technology Approval Scheme (ATAS) clearance certificate from the
Counter-Proliferation and Arms Control Centre of the Foreign, Commonwealth and
Development Office in relation to this course before beginning their study.
Access to public funds
In all cases where you are granting on the basis of private life, you must consider
whether to grant permission to stay with access to public funds.
You must grant access to public funds where the applicant has provided satisfactory
evidence that:
• there are reasons relating to the welfare of a relevant child which outweigh any
reasons for not allowing access
You may need to make further enquiries to establish whether this is the case. When
deciding whether to allow access to public funds, the best interests of a relevant
child must be treated as a primary consideration.
A ‘relevant child’ means a person who both:
• is under the age of 18 years at the date of application; and
• it is clear from the information provided by the applicant, is a child who would
be affected by a decision to impose or maintain the no recourse to public funds
condition
Where the applicant has not provided satisfactory evidence to meet the above test,
you must not grant access to public funds.
For detailed guidance on assessing when to grant access to public funds see:
Access to public funds within family, private life and Hong Kong BN(O) routes
(internal link).
Page 42 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Decisions in cases where a valid application is not
required
Under Appendix FM and Appendix Private Life a valid application is not required
when the Article 8 family or private life claim is raised:
• as part of an asylum claim, or as part of a further submission in person after an
asylum claim has been refused
• where a migrant is in immigration detention - a migrant in immigration detention
or their representative must submit any application or claim raising Article 8 to a
prison officer, a prisoner custody officer, a detainee custody officer, or a
member of Home Office staff at the migrant’s place of detention
• in an appeal (subject to the consent of the Secretary of State where applicable)
A valid application is also not required where the Secretary of State decides to
determine any Article 8 claim in the absence of such an application, for example
under paragraph 400 of Part 13 of the Immigration Rules where the person’s
removal from the UK is contemplated.
Guidance on how to consider such cases is contained in the Family life (as a partner
or parent) and exceptional circumstances guidance:
• Family life (as a partner or parent) and exceptional circumstances (internal)
• Family life (as a partner or parent) and exceptional circumstances (external)
Allowed appeals against refusal under the private life rules
You should refer to the Implementing allowed appeals guidance (internal link).
Where a human rights appeal is allowed, and the Tribunal have found that the
requirements of the Appendix Private Life rules are met you should grant the leave
that the appellant qualified for under the Immigration Rules.
For refusals made under Part 7 of the Immigration Rules, where the Tribunal finds
the relevant rules have not been met, but allows the human rights claim purely on
the basis of exceptional circumstances private life grounds the appellant should be
granted 30 months leave outside the Immigration Rules.
In cases where an appeal has been allowed and leave to remain granted as above,
you must consider whether to grant permission to stay with access to public funds.
You must grant access to public funds where the applicant has provided satisfactory
evidence that:
• they are destitute or at risk of imminent destitution
• there are reasons relating to the welfare of a relevant child which outweigh any
reasons for not allowing access
• they are facing exceptional financial circumstances relating to their income or
expenditure
Page 43 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
You may need to make further enquiries to establish whether the above criteria have
been met.
When deciding whether to allow access to public funds, the best interests of a
relevant child must be treated as a primary consideration.
A ‘relevant child’ means a person who both:
• is under the age of 18 years at the date of application; and
• it is clear from the information provided by the applicant, is a child who would
be affected by a decision to impose or maintain the no recourse to public funds
condition
Where the above criteria have not been met, you must not grant access to public
funds.
For detailed guidance on assessing when to grant access to public funds see:
Access to public funds within family, private life and Hong Kong BN(O) routes
(internal link).
Related content
Contents
Related external links
Implementing allowed appeals (GOV.UK)
Page 44 of 44 Published for Home Office staff on 18 May 2023
Compelling compassionate factors
Where circumstances do not warrant a grant of permission to stay on the basis of
Article 8, you must consider if a grant of leave outside the rules is warranted on
compelling compassionate grounds.
Compelling compassionate factors are, broadly speaking, exceptional circumstances
that warrant a period of leave for a non-Article 8 reason. An example might be where
an applicant or family member has suffered a bereavement and requests a period of
stay to deal with their loss or to make funeral arrangements.
In considering compassionate factors, you must consider all relevant factors raised
by the applicant.
If any compassionate factors are raised in the application, you should consult the
following leave outside the rules guidance:
• Leave outside the Immigration Rules (internal)
• Leave outside the Immigration Rules (external)
You should ensure that where an applicant is granted permission to stay on the
basis of compassionate factors, the decision letter must clearly show that the grant
has been given outside the Immigration Rules on the basis of compassionate
factors, and is not being made on the basis of their Article 8 family or private life.
It is unlikely that leave will be granted for a period of 30 months, but instead should
be a short period of leave to reflect the individual circumstances of the application.
For example, it may be appropriate to grant a period of 6 months’ leave to enable
completion of final examinations taking place within 4 months, to allow for the
examinations and to arrange travel.
Related content
Contents
