USARC Pamphlet 350-14
(7) Follow-up. Require corrections, but allow a
reasonable time for them to be made.
(8) Use inspection results to make your unit better.
Inspections for inspections’ sake waste your time and your
troops’ time; inspections should benefit everyone.
c. Inspector General (IG). The IG, a member of your
personal staff, holds a position of extraordinary trust and
confidence. However, no secrecy or cover up should be
construed in this relationship. Rather, units should consider
the IG to be an extension of your eyes, ears, voice, and
conscience. The IG’s mission is to assess and report, in an
unbiased and objective manner, on all aspects of mission
performance, readiness, resources, economy, efficiency,
discipline, morale, and esprit de corps of the command.
(1) The IG inspects your unit to see if it is in
compliance with existing policies and procedures directed
by higher headquarters. But, more importantly, the IG is
there to assist and to teach.
(2) The IGs at all headquarters (HQDA, FORSCOM,
USARC, CONUSA, MSC, etc.) inspect USAR units. They
conduct general, special, functional, technical, and
follow-up inspections. Some CONUSA commanders have
augmented their IGs with experts in training, logistics, and
other functional areas. Their IGs conduct a single integrated
general inspection called a Command Readiness Inspection
(CRI).
(3) Using inspection results competitively or
comparatively is diametrically opposed to the purpose of the
IG system. They are not designed to reward or penalize
units or individuals. In fact, AR 20-1 specifically prohibits
the use, in any manner, of IG inspection results to
determine unit competition awards or to compare units and
organizations.
(4) The IG also conducts investigations and inquiries
and assists soldiers with a myriad of individual problems
that usually can’t be handled through normal channels.
d. Your role in an IG inspection.
(1) Do not “prepare” extensively just for the IG
inspection. Your unit should be ready for an IG inspection
at any time, just as it should be ready to go to war at any
time. “Preparation for an IG Inspection” is not a valid
training schedule item.
(2) The IG is not interested in whitewash, new paint
on everything, or excessive “spit and polish.” Don’t have
“GI parties”, remake all the records, or require other
“make-work” efforts. However, if a weapon doesn’t work or
required records are nonexistent, the IG will want to know
why (and so should you).
(3) Ensure all of your people are aware of the
inspection and that they have the right to present any
complaint or request for assistance to the IG.
(4) Have qualified, trained, and knowledgeable
people responsible for their specific functional areas
available during the inspection and for the exit briefing.
(5) The IG may be there to check on your unit for
your higher headquarters’ commander, but the IG is also
there to help you.
(6) Use the results of IG inspections to better
accomplish your mission, not to better “prepare” for the
next inspection. An IG inspection is a management tool;
not an end in itself or a method to reward or penalize units
or individuals. The objective is not to “pass” the IG
inspection but to use the results obtained from it as an
indicator of your unit’s capability to go to war and win.
e. Internal Review (IR). Commanders at FORSCOM,
USARC, and MSC have IR offices in their headquarters to
provide a professional auditing service for the command.
(1) The IR office conducts internal audits to assist in
accomplishing the unit’s mission and in safeguarding,
accounting for, and ensuring the proper use of resources.
This office also serves as the focal point for all auditors
external to the command, such as the General Accounting
Office (GAO) and the U.S. Army Audit Agency (USAAA).
The IR performs audit follow-up and tracking of
management actions to correct problems identified in
internal and external audit reports.
(2) Your role as the commander during audits is to
coordinate with higher headquarters when external auditors
arrive in your command, verify their identity and authority
to conduct audit work, and to make all applicable accounts,
books, records, documents, and papers available for
examination by authorized auditors.
(3) Additional information is available in AR 11-7,
AR 36-2, and AR 36-5.
2-8. Evaluations
a. All ARTEP, AT, and IDT evaluations of USAR units
are conducted by various elements in the FORSCOM and
USARC command, control, and supervision structure. Use
the feedback from evaluations to make corrections to unit
training programs so required leader, individual, and
collective task proficiency can be improved and sustained.
Evaluators also provide assistance and advice by giving unit
commanders the benefit of their knowledge, expertise, and
experience.
b. The Command Logistics Review Program (CLRP) is
part of the Army’s Logistics Readiness Program. It is an
assessment and assistance program which reviews unit and
installation logistics operations. Its purpose is to identify
and resolve problems adversely affecting readiness and
logistics postures. Three types of CLRP Teams conduct the
reviews:
(1) Command Logistics Review Team (CLRT).
(2) Command Logistics Review Team-Expanded
(CLRTX).
(3) Command Logistics Review Program-Special
Projects Team (CLRP-SPT).
c. Aviation Resource Management Surveys (ARMS) are
HQDA-directed evaluations of USAR aviation units which
assess the management of aviation-unique functional areas
and programs, identify areas requiring additional emphasis,
and provide staff assistance as necessary. All USAR
aviation units can expect a regularly scheduled FORSCOM,
USARC or CONUSA ARMS at least every 24 months.
Regularly scheduled ARMS may be supplemented by
no-notice ARMS. In some CONUSAs, the ARMS serves as