Claremont Colleges
Scholarship @ Claremont
CMC Senior 5eses CMC Student Scholarship
2019
"e Impacts of Supra-Regional Multi-Resort
Season Passes: A Hedonic Pricing Model of Single-
Day Li# Tickets for US Ski Areas
Sijia Lai
5is Open Access Senior 5esis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized
administrator. For more information, please contact scholarship@cuc.claremont.edu.
Recommended Citation
Lai, Sijia, "5e Impacts of Supra-Regional Multi-Resort Season Passes: A Hedonic Pricing Model of Single-Day Li6 Tickets for US Ski
Areas" (2019). CMC Senior eses. 2218.
h7ps://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/2218
Claremont McKenna College
The Impacts of Supra-Regional Multi-Resort Season Passes:
A Hedonic Pricing Model of Single-Day Lift Tickets for US Ski Areas
Submitted to
Professor Murat Binay
by
Sijia Lai
for
Senior Thesis
Spring 2019
April 29, 2019
2
3
Acknowledgments
I want to thank Professor Murat Binay for being my thesis reader and encouraging me
throughout the journey. I enjoyed learning corporate finance with Professor Binay, and his
knowledge in mergers and acquisitions inspired me to look deeper into the ski industry
developments. In addition, I would not have been able to complete this research without the
guidance and expertise of Professor Heather Antecol and Professor Janet Kiholm Smith. I am also
thankful for my Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE) professors, Professor Adrienne Martin,
Professor Aseema Sinha, and Professor Cameron Shelton, for instilling the love of reading and
writing in me. I would also like to thank the Robert Day Scholars Program for preparing me with
industry analysis knowledge.
This research also benefited from the computer science resources at the Murty Sunak
Quantitative and Computing Lab, especially the help from Tony Jiang and Abel Tadesse who
worked with me on web scraping till late night. I also want to thank Professor Zachary Dodds for
teaching me Python and Data Science and Professor Serkan Ozbeklik for teaching me
econometrics and STATA, which greatly helped my data collection and analysis.
I want to thank my Mom, Dad, and my little brother for wisdom, love, and support. I want
to thank Isaiah and the Kramer family for introducing me to skiing this season. Lastly, I want to
thank 5C Ski & Snowboard Club for making skiing accessible and providing suggestions for my
thesis.
4
Abstract
Numerous media analyses claim that supra-regional multi-resort season passes (mega passes) are
negatively impacting skiing, snowboarding, and winter-sport communities. In particular, media
claims that ski areas on these season passes are charging higher single-day lift ticket prices to
nudge people to buy their season pass products. To test this claim, I use a hedonic pricing model
to estimate the impact of season passes on adult single-day lift ticket prices. By applying OLS
regressions to a dataset of 302 US ski areas for the winter of 2018-19, I find that the ski areas on
the leading season passes (Ikon and Epic Pass) charge price premiums for their adult single-day
lift tickets. However, the magnitude of the price premiums is much smaller after controlling for
ski area characteristics and regional fixed effects.
5
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... 3
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 5
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6
2. Literature Review.......................................................................................................... 10
3. Data and Variables ........................................................................................................ 13
4. Empirical Strategy ........................................................................................................ 19
5. Results ........................................................................................................................... 23
6. Conclusion, Limitations, and Further Research ............................................................ 29
7. Appendices .................................................................................................................... 31
8. References ..................................................................................................................... 43
6
1. Introduction
The winter of 2018-19 was a busy season for US ski areas due to the development of mega
passes (supra-regional multi-resort season passes) through mergers and acquisition and joint
ventures, especially with the two leading season passes, Ikon and Epic Pass. Founded in 2017,
Alterra Mountain Company developed the Ikon Pass to “change the landscape of the mountain
resort industry.”
1
The Ikon Pass lets pass holders enjoy access to its 46 ski resorts on the pass,
discounts on gear rental and dining services, and other benefits such as public transportation.
2
The
Ikon Pass introduced direct competition to Vail Resorts Inc. and its Epic Pass. A longtime industry
leader, Vail went public in 1997 to innovate the industry through buying and improving ski
resorts.
3
In 2008, Vail developed one of the first supra-regional multi-resort season pass in the US,
the Epic Pass, which lets pass holders enjoy unlimited access to Vail’s (then 5) resorts.
4
After
Alterra announced the Ikon Pass, Vail started to accelerate its season pass expansion to offer access
to 67 ski resorts in 8 countries on its Epic Pass.
5
Before the mega passes, regular skiers and snowboarders often buy single-resort or regional
season passes. Season pass products help ski areas to lock in pass-holders’ loyalty and gain a steady
cash flow that mitigates weather unpredictability. The new mega passes cost about the same or
less than a traditional single-resort season pass, thus reducing the cost of skiing and snowboarding
for pass-holders. Considering that the US has stagnant growth of active skiers and snowboarders
and the US ski areas are experiencing declining visits (Figure 1), these season passes should
1
Alterra Mountain Company is a joint venture of KSL Capital Partners and Henry Crown and Company. For more
information, see https://www.alterramtnco.com/news/2018/01/11/announcing-alterra-mountain-company
.
2
See https://www.ikonpass.com/en/shop-passes/ikon-pass-2018-2019 for Ikon Pass details.
3
See http://www.vailresorts.com/Corp/heritage.aspx for Vail’s history.
4
Bloomberg Businessweek’s Kyle Stock wrote a detailes story on Ikon and Epic, “One Pass to Ski Them All,”
which can be viewed online at
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-03-01/epic-vs-ikon-battle-for-the-
best-ski-pass.
5
See http://news.vailresorts.com/corporate/international/2018-19epicpass.htm for Epic Pass details.
7
increase skier and snowboarder visits, thus boosting local retail, restaurant, and lodging
businesses.
6
Figure 1
Numbers of skiers, snowboarders, and visits in the US from 1996 to 2018 show stagnant growth of active
skiers & snowboarders and decreasing visits.
Numbers in millions.
Source: National Ski Areas Association online survey.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/376710/active-skiers-and-snowboarders-in-the-us/
https://www.statista.com/statistics/206544/estimated-number-of-skier-visits-in-the-us-since-2000/
However, more people are concerned with the negative impacts of these new season passes.
For local skiers, season passes mean including traffic jams, lift lines, and rising accommodation
costs.
7
For smaller and independent ski areas, it is now harder to compete with ski areas on season
passes because pass-holders would most likely stay within their pass network.
8
In the US, the
number of operating ski areas has been decreasing over the years (Figure 2), and the development
of the season passes might make the ski area industry even less competitive.
6
For an analysis on the positive effects of season passes, see “The Giant Resort Companies You Hate Are Saving
Skiing” by Marc Peruzzi at Outdoor Magazine. https://www.outsideonline.com/2367016/keep-skiing-weird
.
7
Brigid Mander at Outdoor Magazine wrote an analysis on the negative effects of season passes, see “Actually, the
Mega Season Pass Is Killing Skiing” at https://www.outsideonline.com/2389964/ski-pass-epic-ikon
.
8
Many articles have addressed this concern. For an example, see “On Slippery Slopes” by Gordy Megroz in
Bloomberg Businessweek.
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
2016/17
2017/18
Number of skier visits
Number of skiers Number of snowboarders
Number of skiers & snowboarders Number of skier & snowboarder visits
8
Figure 2
Number of ski resorts operating in the US from 1990 to 2018 shows a decreasing trend.
Source: National Ski Areas Association online survey.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/206534/number-of-ski-resorts-operating-in-the-us-since-1990/
Moreover, critics are suggesting that ski areas on the mega passes might charge higher
prices for single-day lift tickets to nudge people into buying their season passes products. With
single-day lift tickets at Vail during the New Year hitting $209, Vail can claim that their season
passes can quickly pay for itself with just 3 or 4 visits.
9
Considering that skiing and snowboarding
are already expensive, this trend makes skiing and snowboarding less accessible to first-timers and
can slow the growth of potential skiers and snowboarders.
10
This paper examines the claim that supra-regional multi-resort season passes (mega passes)
are increasing the price of single-day lift tickets. By using a hedonic pricing model to control for
ski area characteristics and regional fixed effects, I find that ski areas on the leading season passes
are charging price premiums for their weekday and weekend adult single-day lift tickets. However,
the magnitude of the price differences is smaller than what media suggests, especially for smaller
9
Vanat, Laurent. 2019 International Report on Snow & Mountain Tourism.
10
Stock, Kyle. “One Pass to Ski Them All.”
569
546
529
516
524
519
507
521
509
506
490
493
490
494
492
478
485
481
473
471
486
475
478
470470
463
481
472
400
420
440
460
480
500
520
540
560
580
90/91
91/92
92/93
93/94
94/95
95/96
96/97
97/98
98/99
99/00
00/01
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
10/11
11/12
12/13
13/14
14/15
15/16
16/17
17/18
Number of ski resorts
9
supra-regional multi-resort season passes. Consistent with previous studies, I also find that ski area
characteristics such as vertical drop, base altitude, and lift chairs are significant determinants of
lift ticket prices. I also find statistically significant price differences among different regions. This
study contributes to the analysis of US ski areas, the application of the hedonic pricing model, and
the impacts of market alliances by using new data from the season of 2018-19 with a focus on the
development of season passes.
I organize this paper as follows. Section 2 is a brief literature review on the application of
the hedonic pricing model and ski lift ticket prices. Section 3 presents the data and variables used.
Section 4 details my hypothesis and model specifications. Section 5 presents the empirical results.
And Section 6 concludes this paper with a discussion on limitations and possible further research.
10
2. Literature Review
Ever since Rosen (1974) formalized the hedonic pricing model, researchers have been
using the model to analyze differentiated products and their “utility-bearing attributes.”. The model
is frequently used in real estate to analyze the market, and there have been studies that apply the
hedonic pricing model to lift ticket pricing.
Falk (2011) argues that with no transaction costs, ski lift ticket prices should be a function
of the ski area’s characteristics. Falk examines the international price differences in lift tickets by
applying the hedonic pricing model to one-day and six-day lift tickets while controlling for ski
areas characteristics. Falk uses a sample of 214 ski resorts in Austria, France, and Switzerland for
the 2010-11 season and finds that there are significant price differences in international ski resorts
with Swiss and Austrian resorts charging higher prices than French resorts. The higher price
regions might be less price competitive and productive. Falk also finds that ski characteristics are
significant determinants on lift ticket prices and ski resorts that are part of a greater ski alliance
charge higher prices.
Similarly, Alessandrini (2013) uses a hedonic pricing model to estimate the weekdays and
weekends prices of 19 ski resorts in Italy using data from 2008-2012. Alessandrini finds that ski
area characteristics such as vertical capacity, length of ski slopes, the altitude of lifts, and
percentage of intermediate slopes are significant determinants of the lift ticket price. Comparing
predicted price to the actual price, Alessandrini identifies statistically over- and underpriced ski
areas.
While there are more studies on the European ski resort industry, few looked into the US
market. Fonner and Berrens (2014) apply the hedonic pricing model to ski areas in the US and
examine the effects of crowding. They used data from 181 US ski areas of the 2011-12 season.
11
Their variables included the 2011 prices for single-day lift tickets, the vertical drop and base
altitude of the ski area, the reported annual snowfall, lift capacity, and snowmaking. Using OLS,
they find that physical characteristics are significant determinants of lift ticket prices, and there
exist non-linear crowding effects on the lift ticket price. Increased skiers per hour per acre is
associated with raising lift ticket prices at first and then decreasing lift ticket prices at high levels
of crowding.
Besides the hedonic pricing model, there are other models that scholars have used to
analyze lift ticket prices. Firgo and Kugler (2018) use a spatial autoregressive model to analyze
cooperative pricing in ski areas. They applied the model on data of all ski resorts in Austria for the
2011-12 season while controlling for ski area characteristics and demand side variables. They find
that single-day lift ticket prices of resorts in ski alliances are generally higher, and prices increase
with the size of an alliance and towards the spatial center of an alliance. They also find that ski
resort characteristics such as size and capacity are significant drivers of lift ticket prices. Their
result shows that ski area alliances can have important policy implications.
Mulligan (2011) applies a two-sector Endogenous Fixed Costs model on selected ski areas
in the US from 1980 to 2002 and found higher real prices of lift tickets. Mulligan finds that
declining transportation costs encourage skiers and snowboarders to switch from regional markets
to national resorts. With the wealthiest Americans experiencing the most significant increase in
income, Mulligan finds ski areas raised lift ticket prices and chair lift capacity in both national and
local markets despite stagnant growth of skier days per season and little change in market
concentration.
Overall, few works have been published on ski areas and lift tickets. While some European
scholars have been researching on the slopes, even fewer studies have been done on the US ski
12
resorts industry. I aim to contribute to the literature of applied hedonic pricing model and ski
resorts analysis. My study uses new data from the season of 2018-19 and looks into the recent
development of supra-regional multi-resort season passes in the US. Moreover, this paper uses a
unique dataset web-scraped from OnTheSnow.com, providing a set of codes for future research
and data collection.
13
3. Data and Variables
Whether ski resorts on supra-regional multi-resort season passes (mega passes) are
charging higher single-day lift tickets is investigated by using a cross-sectional dataset containing
302 ski areas in the US for the 2018-19 season. I compiled data from OnTheSnow.com, websites
of ski areas, and websites of season passes.
11
I completed the data collection in early April 2019.
For each ski area, the dataset has information on lift ticket prices, season pass information, ski area
characteristics, and location.
One limitation of my dataset is that it does not include some lesser known ski areas. There
are about 472 operating ski resorts in the United States,
12
and OnTheSnow has information on 331
ski areas as of April 2019. Within these 331 ski areas, some lesser known ones do not have much
information online, and I cannot include them in the dataset. Thus, my dataset is a sample of about
64% of all operating ski areas in the US with selection bias for ski areas with information online.
Another limitation of my dataset is that it is only for the 2018-19 season. Because mega
passes are developed recently, it would be more comprehensive to see the difference in prices
before and after the development of mega passes.
Comparing to previous literature, my dataset lacks detailed location data to test for spatial
price correlation and price cone effect (Firgo and Kugler, 2018), lift capacity to control for the
crowding effects (Fonner and Berrens, 2014; Falk, 2011), actual number of operating days for the
season to control for efficiency (Falk, 2009), and local demand variables to control for differences
in local customers (Firgo and Kugler, 2018; Falk, 2015).
11
I web scraped data on all available US ski areas from OnTheSnow (https://www.onthesnow.com/), a website
maintained by Mountain News Corporation and a leading source of snow and resort information for travelers.
OnTheSnow has some missing data for some ski areas, and I completed the dataset as best as I could through online
research,
12
U.S. Ski Resorts in Operation during 2017/18 Season.
http://www.nsaa.org/media/340688/Number_of_Ski_Areas_by_Season_1718.pdf
14
Table 1 provides definitions and descriptive statistics on each variable used in my model.
We can see there is a variety of lift ticket prices with the cheapest being $15 and the most expensive
being $199. Appendix A provides additional information on data sources. For readers interested
in seeing my complete dataset and web-scraping codes, I have published my work on Kaggle and
Github, and the links can be found in Appendix B.
Table 1. Summary statistics
Variable
Definition
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
Price
adultweekday
Adult weekday lift ticket price (2018-19 US$)
302
$64.83
$33.78
$15
$199
adultweekend
Adult weekend lift ticket price (2018-19 US$)
302
$71.19
$31.47
$20
$199
Mega Passes
ikon
Binary variable for ski areas on Ikon Pass
302
0.09
0.29
0
1
epic
Binary variable for ski areas on Epic Pass
302
0.06
0.23
0
1
peak
Binary variable for ski areas on Peak Pass
302
0.04
0.20
0
1
powerpass
Binary variable for ski areas on Power Pass
302
0.03
0.17
0
1
powder
Binary variable for ski areas on Powder Alliance
302
0.04
0.20
0
1
freedom
Binary variable for ski areas on Freedom Pass
302
0.05
0.22
0
1
Characteristics
famous
Binary variable for highly ranked or popular resorts
302
0.12
0.32
0
1
verticaldrop
Vertical drop in ft
302
1275.38
952.02
100
4425
base
Ski area base elevation in ft
302
3491.46
3150.29
78
10800
terrainsize
Acres of skiable terrain
302
796.55
1900.56
8
26819
daysopen
Projected days open
302
118.61
31.80
25
305
snowfall
Average snowfall in inches
302
189.67
136.75
18
669
gondola
Number of trams or gondolas
302
0.19
0.59
0
4
totalchairs
Total number of chair lifts
302
8.68
6.20
1
42
percentfast
Percentage of high speed chair lifts
302
11.11%
16.76%
0.00%
72.73%
terrainparks
Number of terrain parks
302
2.49
2.11
0
14
snowmakesize
Acres of snowmaking terrain
302
162.35
262.89
0
3379
nightskiing
Binary variable for ski area with night skiing
302
0.57
0.50
0
1
Regions
newengland
Binary variable for ski areas in New England
302
0.17
0.38
0
1
midatlantic
Binary variable for ski areas in Mid Atlantic
302
0.17
0.37
0
1
southeast
Binary variable for ski areas in South East
302
0.04
0.20
0
1
midwest
Binary variable for ski areas in Mid West
302
0.22
0.42
0
1
rocky
Binary variable for ski areas in the Rocky Region
302
0.25
0.43
0
1
west
Binary variable for ski areas in the West
302
0.16
0.36
0
1
Lift ticket prices
Ski areas in the US use various strategies to set their lift ticket prices. Some ski areas set
prices before the season starts, and some change the price based on demand and timing throughout
15
the season. Moreover, with the development of online lift ticket windows such as Liftopia
(https://www.liftopia.com/), ski areas are experimenting with different discount strategies. The
general trend is that weekend prices are higher than weekday prices, and peak season prices are
higher than off-season prices. In this study, I will use the adult single-day lift ticket prices for
weekday and weekend collected by OnTheSnow and published on the ski areas’ websites.
Season passes
In the US, there are mainly three types of season passes. First, single-resort season passes
for local skiers and snowboarders. Almost all ski areas offer these season passes for their loyal
customers for a couple of hundred dollars. These passes usually include unlimited access to the ski
lifts, discounts on ancillary services such as rental and dining, and some access to nearby
partnering ski areas.
Second, local multi-resort programs. Regions such as Colorado and Utah that have many
ski areas close to each other offer local programs for local skiers and snowboarders for a much
more expanded experience. There are great varieties in these local programs. Some are fully
transferable while some are just for one person. Some offer unlimited access while some offer
limited days or discounts. The prices can range from $25 to $4,900.
13
Third, supra-regional multi-resort season passes, or mega passes, are developed recently
and are the focus of this paper. These mega passes include ski areas in multiple states, and some
have international partnering ski areas. Most of these season passes offer unlimited access at some
of their member resorts. This study examines whether ski areas on these mega passes are charging
higher single-day lift ticket prices. I collected data on all US mega passes for the 2018-19 season.
13
For more details on season passes, see https://www.snowridersinternational.org/news/2018/6/6/multi-mountain-
season-passes-available-for-the-20182019-season-other-than-epic-and-ikon.
16
Table 2 provides a summary of these supra-regional multi-resort season passes. Appendix C shows
a complete list of resorts on these season passes.
Table 2.
Summary of US supra-regional multi-resort season passes for the 2018-19 season.
Name
Company
# US ski areas
# Unlimited ski areas
Total ski areas
Ikon Pass
Alterra Mountain Co.
33
15
46
Epic Pass
Vail Resorts, Inc.
18
19
67
Peak Pass
Peak Resorts, Inc.
14
14
14
Power Pass
Mountain Capital Partners
10
6
11
Powder Alliance
partnership of mountains
13
1
19
Freedom Pass
partnership of mountains
19
1
19
Mountain Collective
distributed by Liftopia, Inc.
11
0
17
Notes
For more information on Power Pass, see https://www.outsideonline.com/2159326/ski-king-southwest
Powder Alliance is a partnership of ski areas. Pass-holders enjoy unlimited access to one home mountain.
Freedom Pass is a partnership of ski areas. Pass-holders enjoy unlimited access to one home mountain.
Mountain Collective is not a season pass to any resort, thus excluded from my model.
Mountain Collective gives pass-holders 2-day access and discounts to resorts in its network.
Appendix C contains lists of resorts for these season passes.
Ski areas characteristics
To control for market power from being famous or highly ranked, I generated a dummy
variable “famous” for resorts that are listed in recent articles on highly ranked, most famous, and
most popular ski resorts.
A ski area’s vertical drop is a proxy of a ski area’s experience. In this study, the vertical
drop in ft (verticaldrop) is calculated as the difference between the summit and base elevation by
OnTheSnow. The bigger the vertical drop, the longer one can ski from top to bottom, and the more
different kinds of terrain there might be. In my dataset, the mean vertical drop is 1,275.3ft, the
minimum is 100ft, and the max is 4,425ft. The skiable acre of each ski area, terrainsize, is also a
proxy for the potential experience at the ski area. The mean terrain size is 796.55 acres, with a
minimum of 8 acres and a maximum of 26,819 acres.
17
Figure 3.
Ski areas on the supra-region multi-resort season passes tend to have bigger vertical drop.
The altitude of the base (base), average snowfall in inches (snowfall), and projected
numbers of days open this season (daysopen) are proxies for the ski area snow quality. The higher
the altitude of the base, the more snow the ski area might get. Altitude can also mean better view,
another factor skiers and snowboarders value.
The number of gondolas or trams (gondola), the total number of chair lifts (totalchairs),
and percentage of high-speed chair lifts (percentfast) are important indicators of the investment,
experience, and lines at the ski area. Gondolas and trams are expensive technology, and therefore
a good indicator of the development of the ski area. The more express chair a ski area has, the
more guests the ski area can have, the faster it is to get to the top. The more chairs a ski area has,
the shorter the lines.
The number of terrain parks (terrainparks), the acre of snowmaking area (snowmakesize),
and whether the ski area has night skiing (nightskiing) are additional control variables.
0
50 100 150 200
Lift ticket price (2018-19 US$) for adults on weekday
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Vertical drop measured as difference between the summit and base elevation in ft
seasonpass non-seasonpass
Adj R-squared='0.6073'
18
There are other data that I collected from OnTheSnow. However, due to multicollinearity
concerns, I will not include variables with strong correlations in my model. Interested readers can
access my full dataset on Kaggle.
There are other characteristics that skiers and snowboarders consider. For example,
activities available after a day on the mountain, the food and bar scene, and the overall atmosphere
on the slopes are essential to the overall experience. However, these are hard to quantify and thus
left out of my model.
Regional fix effects
To control for regional fixed effects, I collected the information on each ski areas state,
then generated binary variables indicating the region of each ski area.
19
4. Empirical Strategy
The development of season passes
As mentioned in the introduction, supra-regional multi-resort season passes (mega passes)
in the US were developed in recent years. The reason for such innovation is a response to the
challenges that ski areas face. First, climate change is expected to have significant impacts on
snowfall. While the 2018-19 season has seen significant snowfall, snowfalls in the previous years
have been low.
14
By offering season pass products and ending the sale before the season starts, ski
areas can get steady cash flows regardless of the actual snowfall in the coming season. By owning
or partnering ski areas in different parts of the US and the world, ski conglomerates can reduce
risk to a specific region’s environment.
Second, there is stagnant growth in the number of skier and snowboarder visits to US ski
areas.
15
By offering season pass products, ski areas can encourage pass-holders to visit more often
because there are no more costs on single day lift tickets. Season pass products also incentivize
skiers and snowboarders to visit during non-peak times and avoid peak days, which alleviate
crowds on holidays and create a better experience.
The season pass is also another way for ski areas to develop different revenue streams. For
example, Vail has developed three segments of business: Mountain, Lodging, and Real Estate.
Vail’s lift ticket revenue for the year ended July 31, 2018 was only 43.76% of the total revenue.
16
By offering season passes, ski alliances are locking in pass-holders’ loyalty before the season starts
and encouraging pass-holders to spend on restaurants, hotels, or other services owned by the ski
resort. Because season passes eliminate the costs on lift tickets, skiers and snowboarders might
14
Vanat, Laurent. 2019 International Report on Snow & Mountain Tourism.
15
National Ski Areas Association, http://www.nsaa.org/media/303945/visits.pdf
16
Vail Resorts, Inc. 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018.
20
spend more on après-ski activities and other amenities. Moreover, because skiing and
snowboarding are social sports, pass-holders might bring their friends and families to season pass
ski resorts, creating a network effect.
Under this new dynamic with mega passes, how will ski areas price their single-day lift
ticket prices? The smaller and independent ski areas might have to lower their prices in order to
compete with ski areas on mega passes. The ski areas on mega passes might raise their prices to
nudge people into buying their season pass products.
There are other possible impacts on the single-day lift ticket prices. Ski conglomerates with
their mergers and acquisitions might improve their efficiency through the transfer of knowledge
and economies of scale, which might lower prices. However, multi-resort season passes act as
alliances of ski areas, making the industry less competitive and increasing the market power of ski
areas in the network. Moreover, by investing in ski areas, ski alliances are improving the quality
of their portfolio mountains, thus able to demand higher prices.
Thus, to test the hypothesis that being a member of a mega pass is related to higher single-
day lift ticket prices, we need to control for important factors that influence prices.
Model specifications
Rosen (1974) argues that differentiated goods are valued for their “utility-bearing
attributes.” The implicit prices of these utility-bearing attributes are called “hedonic prices.” In the
market, sellers and buyers often compare the prices of differentiated goods with the attributes that
they value, and then clear the market under equilibrium prices. Econometrically, we can estimate
the hedonic prices by regressing the actual prices of differentiated goods on their observed
attributes.
21
Rosen (1974) describes differentiated products with observed characteristics. Each
product has amount of the th characteristics, and this relationship can be expressed as =
(
1
,
2
, ,
). There are many differentiated products in the market, offering different packages
of . The market clearing price of each differentiated product is a function of , consumer tastes,
and production costs.
Assuming perfect competition and utility maximizing behavior and ignoring random terms,
Rosen (1974) suggests prices of differentiated goods can be modeled as
(
)
=
(
1
,
2
, ,
,
1
) (demand),
(
)
=
(
1
,
2
, ,
,
2
) (supply),
for = 1, , .
1
represents exogenous demand side variables such as income and taste.
2
represents exogenous supply side variables such as costs and technologies.
The US ski area industry is a differentiated market with information and lift ticket purchase
options widely accessible online. Each ski area has various “utility-bearing” characteristics
differentiated through natural geography, capital investments, and operation efficiency. The lift
ticket price is essentially the price of using the ski area because it is time-consuming and
challenging to hike up the ski area without the help of chair lifts. While there are markets for
backcountry, helicopter, snowcat, and other forms of skiing and snowboarding, I will limit my
analysis to traditional alpine ski areas.
From surveying ski area literature and interviewing skiers and snowboarders, I find that
snow quality, vertical drop and variety of terrain, social scene and après-ski activities, chair lifts
quality, crowds and lines, season pass, and total costs are some factors considered by skiers and
snowboarders. Considering limited available data, multicollinearity, and potential data error, I will
22
follow Fonner and Berrens (2014) to use a simple ordinary least squares linear form to estimate
lift ticket prices.
My full model can be expressed as follows:
= + (
) + (
) + (
) +
where represents ski areas, is the price of single-day lift tickets, SP is a vector of season passes
including Ikon Pass, Epic Pass, Peak Pass, Power Pass, Powder Alliance, and Freedom Pass, SC
is a vector of ski area characteristics including reputation, vertical drop, base elevation, skiable
acres, projected days open, average snowfall, number of gondolas, total number of chair lifts,
percentage of high-speed chair lifts, number of terrain parks, acres of snowmaking terrain, and
nightskiing. R is a vector of region fixed effects including New England, Mid Atlantic, Southeast,
Midwest, the Rocky Mountains, and the West (as the reference category). Lastly, is the error
term. With the estimate results, I can then estimate the implicit marginal prices for each ski area
characteristics:

=
For all of my models, I will use both weekday and weekend adult single-day lift ticket
prices. I will first regress single-day lift ticket prices on binary variables of season passes, without
controlling characteristics and regions. The first model estimates the information when skiers and
snowboarders compare ski areas on and off the season pass. The binary variables on season passes
should capture the net price level shift resulting from being on the season pass.
23
5. Results
Based on the discussion above, ski areas on the supra-regional multi-resort season passes
(mega passses) might charge higher adult single-day lift ticket prices depending on the interaction
of market power and competition, efficiency and quality improvement, and their goals of making
mega pass products more attractive.
The OLS results of my models are presented below in Table 3. Season passes, ski area
characteristics and regional fixed effects are subsequently introduced. To make the results easier
to interpret, I transformed verticaldrop, base, terrainsize, and snowmakesize numbers to be in
hundreds. The estimated coefficients describe the dollar amount impacts on lift ticket prices.
Statistically significant estimates are indicated with stars.
Overall, the OLS model fit well with an adjusted R-squared of 0.833 for weekday lift
tickets in model (3) and 0.826 for weekend lift tickets in model (6). The adjusted R-squared means
that my model explains about 83% of the variation in single-day lift ticket prices. I plotted the
residuals using kernel density estimate and test normality in residuals. Appendix D shows plots
for model (3) and (6), and they approach normality. The mean VIF row reports the variance
inflation factors for each model. Usually, a VIF above 10 indicates multicollinearity. Model (1) to
(6) show low correlations among the variables. Appendix E shows the correlation matrix for the
variables used in my models.
24
Table 3.
OLS Estimates of lift ticket hedonic prices.
Dependent variable: adult single-day lift ticket prices, weekday and weekend, season 2018-19.
Weekday Prices
Weekend Prices
Variable
(1)   
(2)   
(3)   
(4)   
(5)   
(6)   
Season Passes
ikon
63.5804***
16.5748***
15.4896***
59.0523***
14.8227***
13.1133** 
epic
72.6269***
20.6080***
19.9757***
67.3727***
17.6515** 
17.5258***
peak
7.1071   
4.9752   
4.6695   
6.2433   
2.2240   
2.0452   
powerpass
16.8225*  
4.1371   
5.8557   
11.1937   
2.6114   
4.9047   
powder
21.3169** 
3.8826   
2.9164   
15.4925*  
.2219   
-.1166   
freedom
-4.36147   
-.2172   
-1.2809   
-3.4565   
1.2352   
.1038   
Characteristics
famous
   
4.9026   
3.5450   
   
5.0838   
3.6813   
vdrop100
   
.5901** 
.71293***
   
.5910** 
.6126** 
base100
   
.1144** 
.3448***
   
.0625   
.3371***
terrain100
   
.0118   
.0162   
   
-.0006   
.0183   
daysopen
   
.0638   
.0232   
   
.0744   
.0210   
snowfall
   
-.0019   
.0073   
   
-.0086   
.0111   
gondola
   
4.7496   
5.6351*  
   
3.6450   
4.8039*  
totalchairs
   
1.1614***
1.2370***
   
1.2516***
1.4015***
percentfast
   
.4559***
.4420***
   
.4458***
.4305***
terrainparks
   
-.0518   
-.2652   
   
-.0185   
-.1446   
snowmake100
   
.9051   
.6775   
   
1.0025   
.7024   
nightskiing
   
-5.2539*  
-2.8082   
   
-1.9585   
.2796   
Regions
newengland
   
   
12.6394*  
   
   
18.0968***
midatlantic
   
   
9.6770*  
   
   
15.2339***
southeast
   
   
3.3155   
   
   
19.5624***
midwest
   
   
8.4324   
   
   
8.9376   
rocky
   
   
-9.6933*  
   
   
-10.8661** 
_constant
53.3544***
27.8401***
17.0211*  
60.8335***
34.0775***
19.4376*  
Observations
302   
302   
302   
302   
302   
302   
R-squared
.5195   
.8359   
.8458   
.5068   
.8093   
.8396   
Adj. R-squared
Mean VIF
.5098   
1.09
.8255   
2.03
.8330   
2.93
.4968   
1.09
.7972   
2.03
.8263  
2.93 
legend: * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001
Season pass price premium becomes smaller after adding control variables
Model (1) and (2) show that including control variables of ski area characteristics in the
hedonic pricing model lowers the predicted price premium associated with season passes. Model
(1) shows that if we only compare lift ticket prices based on whether a ski area is on a season
passes, there are expensive premiums associated with season passes. For example, on average, ski
areas on the Ikon Pass charge $63.58 more for a lift ticket than ski areas not on a season pass, other
25
things being equal. Appendix F shows a more comprehensive comparison of ski areas on different
season passes. Model (2) adds measures of ski areas characteristics and the coefficients of season
passes drop significantly. For example, the Ikon Pass price premium drops from $63.58 to $16.57,
other things being equal. Model (3) adds binary variables to control for regional fixed effects, and
the estimated coefficients for season passes are similar to model (2) estimations. This pattern is
mirrored in model (4), (5), and (6) for weekend prices. The estimates in Table 3 are consistent with
the hypothesis that season passes are increasing their single-day lift ticket prices, but on a smaller
scale than we hypothesized.
Ikon and Epic Pass are associated with higher price premiums
Comparing the coefficients of season passes in model (3) and (6), only Ikon and Epic Pass
show statistical significance. Peak and Power Pass are associated with price premiums on their lift
ticket prices but a much smaller scale. Powder Alliance and Freedom Pass have unclear impacts
on their lift ticket prices. A possible explanation is that Ikon and Epic Pass have more member ski
areas and other amnesties, thus charging more for their market power and quality. Another possible
explanation is that the owners of Ikon and Epic Pass, Alterra Mountain Co. and Vail Resorts Inc.,
are the leading players in the development of supra-regional multi-resort season passes. Thus, Ikon
and Epic Pass are more actively nudging their customers to buy season passes by putting higher
price premiums on their single-day lift tickets.
Ski area characteristics and implicit marginal prices
The coefficients of characteristics confirm the hedonic hypothesis that differentiated
products such as ski areas are valued for their “utility-bearing” characteristics. Looking at model
(3) and (6), characteristics such as vertical drop, base altitude, number of gondolas, the total
26
number of chair lifts, and percent of high-speed chair lifts are statistically significant. A 100-foot
increase in the vertical drop is associate with a marginal implicit price of $0.61 for weekdays and
$0.71 for weekends.
17
A 100-foot increase in base altitude is associated with $0.34 for weekdays
and weekends. An additional gondolas or trams (gondola) is associated with $5.6 higher price for
weekdays and $4.8 for weekends. An additional chair lift (totalchairs), regardless of technologies,
is associated with $1.2 for weekdays and $1.4 for weekends. Lastly, one percent increase in the
percentage of high-speed chair lifts is associated with $0.4 increase in weekdays and weekend
price. These are consistent with intuition because higher measures of these characteristics usually
mean better skiing and snowboarding experiences.
Most characteristics show the expected sign except snowfall, terrainparks, and nightskiing.
A one-inch increase in average snowfall in inches (snowfall) has negative signs in model (2) and
(5) but positive signs in model (3) and (6). The unclear sign and statistical insignificance suggest
that while snow quality is vital to skiers and snowboarders, the average snowfall is not a good
indicator. The accuracy of the snowfall level is also up for debate. Zinman and Zitzewitz (2016)
find that ski areas often report more snowfall than other sources, and the difference is more
pronounced on weekends.
In model (2), (3), (5), and (6), terrainparks has negative signs, which means that having
one more terrain park is associated with a decrease in lift ticket price. This result is surprising
because having terrain parks means there is a variety of terrain to perform or practice tricks. One
possible explanation is that terrain parks might be associated with the risk of injury. Another
possibility is that terrain parks only appeal to a subset of skiers and snowboarders, and ski areas
cannot charge a price premium. Similarly, the impact of having night skiing is unclear, with mostly
17
Consistent with Fonner and Berrens (2014).
27
negative signs in model (2), (3), and (5). It is possible that night skiing is less appealing than day
skiing, and ski areas cannot place a price premium.
Table 4
Marginal implicit prices of statistically significant ski area characteristics.
Weekday Prices
Weekend Prices
Variable
(2)   
(3)   
(5)   
(6)   
Definition
vdrop100
0.5901** 
0.7129***
0.5910** 
0.6126** 
Additional 100ft vertical drop.
base100
0.1144** 
0.3448***
0.0625   
0.3371***
Additional 100ft base elevation.
gondola
4.7496   
5.6351*  
3.6450   
4.8039*  
One additional tram or gondola.
totalchairs
1.1614***
1.2370***
1.2516***
1.4015***
One additional chair lifts.
percentfast
0.4559***
0.4420***
0.4458***
0.4305***
One percent increase in percentage
of high speed chair lifts.
legend: * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001
Differences between weekday and weekend and regional fixed effects
Model (3) and (6) show that regions become statistically significant on the weekends. The
results suggest that ski areas in New England, Mid Atlantic, and South East charge higher lift ticket
prices on the weekends than on weekdays. For example, the coefficient of southeast is 3.3155 in
model (3) and 19.5624 in model (6), which means that ski areas in the South East, on average and
other things being equal, charge about $16 more on the weekends.
However, ski areas in the Mid-West, Rocky Mountains, and the West (_constant) do not
have much price differences between weekdays and weekends. The regional difference can be an
indicator of local market competitions.
Robustness check
Appendix C is a list of all ski areas on all mega passes for season 2018-19, and it shows
that Powder Alliance and the Freedom Pass has many ski areas that are also in other mega
passes. Moreover, Powder Alliance and the Freedom Pass are structured differently from the
other passes. Powder Alliance and the Freedom Pass are complementary when one purchases a
28
single-resort season pass at a ski area that is part of the alliance. Pass-holders enjoy unlimited
access to one home ski resort and some access to the other ski areas on the pass. On the other
hand, Ikon, Epic, Peak, and Power Pass all offer unlimited access to multiple ski areas.
Therefore, including Powder Alliance and the Freedom Pass in my models might be incorrect.
Table 5 presents the OLS estimates of my models excluding Powder Alliance and the
Freedom Pass. The results are similar to my models in Table 3. Previously significant variables
are still significant in model (2), (3), (5), and (6).
Table 5.
OLS estimates without powder and freedom pass variables show similar results to previous models.
Weekday Prices
Weekend Prices
Variable
(1)   
(2)   
(3)   
(4)   
(5)   
(6)   
Season Passes
ikon
62.8131***
16.1447***
15.2203***
58.5139***
14.7538***
13.1217** 
epic
73.1739***
20.6450***
20.0146***
67.7843***
17.6374** 
17.5230***
peak
6.4002   
4.9502   
4.7091   
5.7436   
2.1635   
2.0411   
powerpass
18.5150** 
4.4369   
5.5448   
12.2762   
3.3064   
4.9454   
Characteristics
famous
   
4.2198   
2.9927   
   
5.1188   
3.7063   
vdrop100
   
.6034** 
.7233***
   
.5973** 
.6123** 
base100
   
.1171** 
.3478***
   
.0617   
.3370***
terrain100
   
.0092   
.0147   
   
-.0015   
.0183   
daysopen
   
.0675   
.0266   
   
.0738   
.0208   
snowfall
   
-.0006   
.0081   
   
-.0085   
.0111   
gondola
   
4.5197   
5.4616*  
   
3.6352   
4.8113*  
totalchairs
   
1.1902***
1.2608***
   
1.2479***
1.4004***
percentfast
   
.4612***
.4478***
   
.4438***
.4302***
terrainparks
   
-.0911   
-.2998   
   
-.0181   
-.1431   
snowmake100
   
.8928   
.6664   
   
1.0018   
.7028   
nightskiing
   
-4.9591*  
-2.5659   
   
-1.9807   
.2693   
Regions
newengland
   
   
12.4491*  
   
   
18.1081***
midatlantic
   
   
9.5741*  
   
   
15.2364***
southeast
   
   
3.1783   
   
   
19.5655***
midwest
   
   
8.3974   
   
   
8.9375   
rocky
   
   
-9.8802** 
   
   
-10.8590** 
_constant
54.0613***
26.8597***
16.2326*  
61.3333***
34.2211***
19.4778*  
Observations
302   
302   
302   
302   
302   
302   
R-squared
.5020   
.8355   
.8455   
.4960   
.8093   
.8396   
Adj. R-squared
.4953   
.8263   
.8339   
.4892   
.7986   
.8276   
legend: * p<0.05; ** p<0.01; *** p<0.001
29
6. Conclusion, Limitations, and Further Research
Using a hedonic pricing model on a dataset of 302 US ski areas for the season of 2018-19,
I estimate the impact of supra-regional multi-resort season passes on adult single-day lift ticket
prices. I find that the ski areas on the leading season passes (Ikon and Epic Pass) charge price
premiums for their adult single-day lift tickets. However, the magnitude of the price premiums is
much smaller after controlling for ski area characteristics and regional fixed effects. The estimated
implicit marginal prices of ski area characteristics are intuitive and mostly show expected signs.
The model results also point out differences between weekday and weekend prices as well as
regional price differences.
While my research shows that there are price premiums associated with leading season
passes, I cannot conclude whether ski areas are doing so to nudge people into buying the season
passes. However, the price premiums on single-day lift tickets might mean day-trippers are paying
the premium without getting the benefit of a season pass. However, one interesting note is that
season passes offer friends and families of their pass holders discounted tickets based on the single-
day lift ticket window prices. To make up for the potential loss of revenue, they might charge
higher single-day lift ticket prices.
One limitation of my research is that I am only looking at the full priced single-day lift
ticket as published on OnTheSnow.com and the ski area website. In reality, many people are able
to find discounted tickets on websites such as liftopia.com. The expected price of a single-day lift
ticket can be much lower than the full price. Since percentage discounts is an important form of
advertisement, ski areas might want to charge a higher full price.
For future research, some more extensive data collection might be needed.
OnTheSnow.com has many ski areas, but not all. This research uses a simple OLS regression, but
further statistical sophistication might be more insightful. For example, Firgo and Kugler (2018)
30
use a spatial autocorrelation model to analyze lift ticket prices and find price level shift, price cone
effect, and spatial price correlation. By having more detailed location data, future research can get
a better sense of the US ski area market structure.
31
7. Appendices
Appendix A.
Data
Sources
Prices
OnTheSnow.com
Web sites of individual ski areas.
Mega Passes
Web sites of individual passes.
https://www.ikonpass.com/en/shop-passes/ikon-pass-2018-2019
http://news.vailresorts.com/corporate/2018-19lastchanceepicpassvailresorts.htm
https://www.epicpass.com/info/stowe-faq.aspx
https://www.peakpass.com/
Season pass guides.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robreed/2018/09/11/epic
-versus-ikon-comparing-the-
20182019-multi-resort-ski-passes/#5e2ac856714a
https://www.snowridersinternational.org/news/2018/6/6/multi
-mountain-season-passes-
available-for-the-20182019-season-other-than-epic-and-ikon
Famous
Recent articles on ski areas.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/christophersteiner/2018/11/28/the
-top-10-ski-resorts-in-
north-america-for-2019/#5d0fa73a5ec7
https://www.snowpak.com/usa/best-ski-resorts
https://www.zrankings.com/
https://www.planetware.com/world/top-rated-ski-resorts-in-the-world-us-co-88.htm
https://snowbrains.com/top-10-most-popular-us-ski-resorts/
https://www.travelandleisure.com/hotels
-resorts/mountain-ski-resorts/best-in-snow-
liftopia#magic-mountain-vermont
Other Characteristics
OnTheSnow.com
Web sites of individual ski areas.
Regions
OnTheSnow.com
Appendix B.
Links to Kaggle and Github.
Kaggle.com
Kaggle is an online platform for data scientists.
My datasets can be found here:
https://www.kaggle.com/sijialai/onthesnow
Github.com
Github is a software development platform.
My web-scrapers can be found here:
https://github.com/SijiaLai/OnTheSnow
Appendix C.
List of ski areas on supra-regional multi-resort season passes for season 2018-19.
Name of ski resort
Mega Pass
US Ski Area
Unlimited
Steamboat, CO
Ikon Pass
1
1
Winter Park Resort, CO
Ikon Pass
1
1
Copper Mountain Resort, CO
Ikon Pass
1
1
Eldora Mountain Resort, CO
Ikon Pass
1
1
Squaw Valley Alpine Meadows, CA
Ikon Pass
1
1
Mammoth Mountain, CA
Ikon Pass
1
1
June Mountain, CA
Ikon Pass
1
1
Bear Mountain, CA
Ikon Pass
1
1
32
Snow Summit, CA
Ikon Pass
1
1
Stratton, VT
Ikon Pass
1
1
Snowshoe, WV
Ikon Pass
1
1
Crystal Mountain, WA
Ikon Pass
1
1
Tremblant, Canada, QC
Ikon Pass
0
1
Blue Mountain, ON
Ikon Pass
0
1
Solitude Mountain Resort, UT
Ikon Pass
1
1
Jackson Hole Mountain Resort, WY
Ikon Pass
1
0
Big Sky Resort, MT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Sugarbush Resort, VT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Boyne Highlands, MI
Ikon Pass
1
0
Boyne Mountain, MI
Ikon Pass
1
0
The Summit at Snoqualmie, WA
Ikon Pass
1
0
Revelstoke Mountain Resort, Canada, BC
Ikon Pass
0
0
Cypress, Canada, BC
Ikon Pass
0
0
Sunday River, ME
Ikon Pass
1
0
Sugarloaf, ME
Ikon Pass
1
0
Loon Mountain, NH
Ikon Pass
1
0
Taos, NM
Ikon Pass
1
0
Deer Valley Resort, UT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Brighton, UT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Thredbo, Australia
Ikon Pass
0
0
Niseko United, Japan
Ikon Pass
0
0
Valle Nevado, Chile
Ikon Pass
0
0
Snowmass, CO
Ikon Pass
1
0
Aspen Mountain, CO
Ikon Pass
1
0
Aspen Highlands, CO
Ikon Pass
1
0
Buttermilk, CO
Ikon Pass
1
0
Snowbird. UT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Alta. UT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Killington, VT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Pico, VT
Ikon Pass
1
0
Banff Sunshine, Canada, AB
Ikon Pass
0
0
Lake Louise, Canada, AB
Ikon Pass
0
0
Mt. Norquay, Canada, AB
Ikon Pass
0
0
Mt Hutt, New Zealand
Ikon Pass
0
0
Coronet Peak, New Zealand
Ikon Pass
0
0
The Remarkables, New Zealand
Ikon Pass
0
0
Sum
33
15
Total
46
Vail, CO
Epic Pass
1
1
Beaver Creek, CO
Epic Pass
1
1
Breckenridge, CO
Epic Pass
1
1
Arapahoe Basin, CO
Epic Pass
1
1
Park City, UT
Epic Pass
1
1
Keystone, CO
Epic Pass
1
1
Crested Butte, CO
Epic Pass
1
1
Heavenly, CA
Epic Pass
1
1
Northstar, CA
Epic Pass
1
1
Kirkwood, CA
Epic Pass
1
1
Stevens Pass, WA
Epic Pass
1
1
Wilmot, WI
Epic Pass
1
1
Afton Alps, MN
Epic Pass
1
1
33
Mt Brighton, MI
Epic Pass
1
1
Stowe, VT
Epic Pass
1
1
Okemo, VT
Epic Pass
1
1
Mount Sunapee, NH
Epic Pass
1
1
Whistler Blackcomb, Canada, BC
Epic Pass
0
1
Telluride, CO
Epic Pass
1
0
Fernie Alpine Resort, Canada, BC
Epic Pass
0
0
Kicking Horse Mountain Resort, Canada, BC
Epic Pass
0
0
Kimberley Alpine Resort, Canada, BC
Epic Pass
0
0
Nakiska Ski Area, Canada, Alberta
Epic Pass
0
0
Mont-Sainte Anne, Canada, Quebec
Epic Pass
0
0
Stoneham, Canada, Quebec
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba 47 Winter Sports Park, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba Cortina Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba Goryu Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba Happo-One Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba Iwatake Snow Field, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba Norikura Onsen Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Jiigatake Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Kashimayari Ski Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Tsugaike Kogen Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Hakuba Sanosaka Snow Resort, Japan
Epic Pass
0
0
Perisher, Australia
Epic Pass
0
1
Val Thorens, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Méribel, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Courchevel, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Les Menuires, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Saint Martin de Bellevelle, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
La Tania, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Orelle, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Brides-Les-Bains, Les 3 Vallees, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Les Arcs, Paradiski, France
Epic Pass
0
0
La Plagne, Paradiski, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Peisey-Vallandry, Paradiski, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Tignes, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Val D’Isere, France
Epic Pass
0
0
Madonna di Campiglio, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Pinzolo, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Folgarida-Marilleva, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Peio, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Ponte di Legno-Tonale, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Andalo-Fai della Paganella, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Monte Bondone, Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Folgarida-Lavarone. Skirama Dolomiti, Italy
Epic Pass
0
0
Verbier, 4 Vallees, Switzerland
Epic Pass
0
0
La Tzoumaz, 4 Vallees, Switzerland
Epic Pass
0
0
Nendaz, 4 Vallees, Switzerland
Epic Pass
0
0
Veysonnaz, 4 Vallees, Switzerland
Epic Pass
0
0
Thyon, 4 Vallees, Switzerland
Epic Pass
0
0
Lech, Arlberg , Austra
Epic Pass
0
0
Zurs, Arlberg , Austra
Epic Pass
0
0
Stuben, Arlberg , Austra
Epic Pass
0
0
St Christoph, Arlberg , Austra
Epic Pass
0
0
34
St Anton, Arlberg , Austra
Epic Pass
0
0
Sum
18
19
Total
67
Attitash Mountain, NH
Peak Pass
1
1
Crotched Mountain, NH
Peak Pass
1
1
Wildcat Mountain, NH
Peak Pass
1
1
Hunter, NY
Peak Pass
1
1
Alpine Valley, OH
Peak Pass
1
1
Boston Mills, OH
Peak Pass
1
1
Brandywine, OH
Peak Pass
1
1
Mad River, OH
Peak Pass
1
1
Jack Frost, PA
Peak Pass
1
1
Big Boulder, PA
Peak Pass
1
1
Liberty Mountain, PA
Peak Pass
1
1
Roundtop , PA
Peak Pass
1
1
Whitetail, PA
Peak Pass
1
1
Mount Snow, VT
Peak Pass
1
1
Sum
0
14
14
Total
14
Purgatory, CO
Power Pass
1
1
Hesperus, CO
Power Pass
1
1
Arizona Snowbowl, AZ
Power Pass
1
1
Pajarito, NM
Power Pass
1
1
Sipapu, NM
Power Pass
1
1
Nordic Valley, UT
Power Pass
1
1
Copper Mountain, CO
Power Pass
1
0
Kiroro Ski Resort, Japan
Power Pass
0
0
Loveland, CO
Power Pass
1
0
Monarch, CO
Power Pass
1
0
Powderhorn, CO
Power Pass
1
0
Sum
0
10
6
Total
11
Angel Fire, NM
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Bogus Basin, ID
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Bridger Bowl, UT
Powder Alliance
1
NA
China Peak, CA
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Castle Mountain Resort, Canada, AB
Powder Alliance
0
NA
Loveland, CO
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Kiroro, Japan
Powder Alliance
0
NA
La Parva, Chile
Powder Alliance
0
NA
Mountain High, CA
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Ski Marmot Basin, Canada, AB
Powder Alliance
0
NA
Monarch Mountain, CO
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Sierra-at-Tahoe. CA
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Mt. Hood Skibowl, OR
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Schweitzer, ID
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Sugar Bowl Resort, CA
Powder Alliance
1
NA
SilverStar, Canada, BC
Powder Alliance
0
NA
Stevens Pass, WA
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Whitewater, Canada, BC
Powder Alliance
0
NA
Timberline, OR
Powder Alliance
1
NA
Sum
13
NA
Total
19
35
Lost Valley, ME
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Black Mountain, NH
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Dartmouth Skiway, NH
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Whaleback, NH
Freedom Pass
1
NA
McIntyre, NH
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Bolton, VT
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Magic, VT
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Plattekill, NY
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Yawgoo, RI
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Buck Hill, MN
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Ski Cooper, CO
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Sunlight, CO
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Ski Hesperus, CO
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Purgatory, CO
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Nordic Valley, UT
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Pajarito, NM
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Sipapu, NM
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Arizona Snowbowl, AZ
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Eaglecrest, AK
Freedom Pass
1
NA
Sum
19
NA
Total
19
Alta, UT
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Aspen Snowmass Mountains, CO
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Banff Sunshine, Canada, AB
Mountain Collective
0
NA
Big Sky, MT
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Coronet Peak and The Remarkables, New Zealand
Mountain Collective
0
NA
Jackson Hole, WY
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Lake Louise, Canada, AB
Mountain Collective
0
NA
Mammoth Mountains, CA
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Revelstoke, Canada, BC
Mountain Collective
0
NA
Snowbasin, UT
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Snowbird, UT
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Squaw Valley Alpine Meadows, CA
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Sugarbush VT
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Sun Valley, ID
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Taos, NM
Mountain Collective
1
NA
Thredbo Alpine Village, Australia
Mountain Collective
0
NA
Niseko United, Japan
Mountain Collective
0
NA
Sum
0
11
NA
Count
17
36
Appendix D.
Using kernel density plots to check normality of residuals of model (3).
Using kernel density plots to check normality of residuals in model (6).
37
38
Appendix F.
Summary statistics for ski areas on each mega passes and not on mega passes in my dataset,
Ski areas on the Ikon Pass.
Variable
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
28
$117.54
$31.63
$70.00
$179.00
adultweekend
28
$120.29
$29.77
$78.00
$179.00
verticaldrop
28
2,505.46
999.07
500
4,406
base
28
5,325.50
3,292.69
620
9,712
gondola
28
0.86
1.04
0
3
totalchairs
28
16.96
9.89
6
42
percentfast
28
33.5%
16.2%
8.3%
66.7%
Ski areas on the Epic Pass.
Variable
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
17
$127.24
$49.54
$52.00
$199.00
adultweekend
17
$129.12
$47.04
$59.00
$199.00
verticaldrop
17
2,380.18
1,247.06
230
4,425
base
17
5,461.94
3,463.59
800
9,600
gondola
17
1.12
1.22
0
4
totalchairs
17
19.88
9.23
10
41
percentfast
17
30.4%
19.7%
0.0%
64.5%
Ski areas on the Peak Pass.
Variable Obs
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
13
$60.46
$15.31
$39.00
$79.00
adultweekend
13
$67.08
$17.89
$43.00
$89.00
verticaldrop
13
920.54
660.68
230
2,112
base
13
1,109.00
487.27
570
1,950
gondola
13
0.00
0.00
0
0
totalchairs
13
9.69
4.48
5
20
percentfast
13
9.1%
10.5%
0.0%
23.1%
Ski areas on the Power Pass.
Variable
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
9
$79.56
$34.79
$45.00
$158.00
adultweekend
9
$80.11
$34.20
$47.00
$158.00
verticaldrop
9
1,723.78
626.53
960
2,738
base
9
8,907.33
1,616.76
5,440
10,800
gondola
9
0.11
0.33
0
1
totalchairs
9
9.11
6.11
4
24
percentfast
9
10.7%
11.7%
0.0%
29.2%
Ski areas in the Powder Alliance.
Variable
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
13
$82.85
$16.76
$63.00
$125.00
adultweekend
13
$83.23
$17.36
$63.00
$125.00
verticaldrop
13
2,017.69
646.29
1,162
3,690
base
13
6,684.92
2,288.11
3,600
10,800
gondola
13
0.08
0.28
0
1
totalchairs
13
10.23
2.28
7
14
percentfast
13
21.3%
20.0%
0.0%
62.5%
39
Ski areas on the Freedom Pass.
Variable
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
16
$54.25
$18.47
$29.00
$89.00
adultweekend
16
$60.88
$14.78
$45.00
$89.00
verticaldrop
16
1,257.88
584.29
240
2,300
base
16
4,371.44
3,853.70
255
10,500
gondola
16
0.00
0.00
0
0
totalchairs
16
5.50
2.28
3
12
percentfast
16
2.3%
6.8%
0.0%
25.0%
Ski areas not on a supra-regional multi-resort season
pass.
Variable
Obs
Mean
Std. Dev.
Min
Max
adultweekday
215
$53.06
$20.06
$15.00
$135.00
adultweekend
215
$60.56
$18.79
$20.00
$135.00
verticaldrop
215
1,006.40
743.38
100
3,430
base
215
2,963.03
2,862.32
78
10,780
gondola
215
0.07
0.30
0
3
totalchairs
215
6.82
3.17
1
18
percentfast
215
6.9%
13.3%
0.0%
72.7%
Appendix G.
List of ski areas used in this study.
Ski area name
State
Alyeska Resort
AK
Eaglecrest Ski Area
AK
Hilltop Ski Area
AK
Arizona Snowbowl
AZ
Sunrise Park Resort
AZ
Yosemite Ski & Snowboard Area
CA
Bear Mountain
CA
Bear Valley
CA
Boreal Mountain Resort
CA
Dodge Ridge
CA
Donner Ski Ranch
CA
Heavenly Mountain Resort
CA
June Mountain
CA
Kirkwood
CA
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area
CA
Mt. Shasta Ski Park
CA
Mountain High
CA
Mt. Baldy
CA
Northstar California
CA
Sierra-at-Tahoe
CA
Ski China Peak
CA
Snow Summit
CA
Snow Valley
CA
Soda Springs
CA
Squaw Valley - Alpine Meadows
CA
Sugar Bowl Resort
CA
Tahoe Donner
CA
Arapahoe Basin Ski Area
CO
Aspen / Snowmass
CO
Beaver Creek
CO
Breckenridge
CO
Copper Mountain Resort
CO
Crested Butte Mountain Resort
CO
Purgatory
CO
Eldora Mountain Resort
CO
Howelsen Hill
CO
Keystone
CO
Loveland
CO
Monarch Mountain
CO
Powderhorn
CO
Silverton Mountain
CO
Cooper
CO
Ski Granby Ranch
CO
Sunlight Mountain Resort
CO
Telluride
CO
Vail
CO
Winter Park Resort
CO
Wolf Creek Ski Area
CO
Mohawk Mountain
CT
Mount Southington Ski Area
CT
Powder Ridge Park
CT
Ski Sundown
CT
Woodbury Ski Area
CT
40
Bogus Basin
ID
Brundage Mountain Resort
ID
Kelly Canyon Ski Area
ID
Lookout Pass Ski Area
ID
Magic Mountain Ski Area
ID
Pebble Creek Ski Area
ID
Pomerelle Mountain Resort
ID
Schweitzer
ID
Silver Mountain
ID
Sun Valley
ID
Tamarack Resort
ID
Chestnut Mountain Resort
IL
Four Lakes
IL
Ski Snowstar Winter Sports Park
IL
Villa Olivia
IL
Paoli Peaks
IN
Perfect North Slopes
IN
Mt. Crescent Ski Area
IA
Seven Oaks
IA
Sundown Mountain
IA
Camden Snow Bowl
ME
Lost Valley
ME
Mt. Abram Ski Resort
ME
New Hermon Mountain
ME
Shawnee Peak
ME
Sugarloaf
ME
Sunday River
ME
Wisp
MD
Berkshire East
MA
Blandford Ski Area
MA
Bousquet Ski Area
MA
Jiminy Peak
MA
Nashoba Valley
MA
Otis Ridge Ski Area
MA
Ski Butternut
MA
Ski Ward
MA
Wachusett Mountain Ski Area
MA
Alpine Valley Ski Area
MI
Big Powderhorn Mountain
MI
Bittersweet Ski Area
MI
Big Snow Resort - Blackjack
MI
Boyne Highlands
MI
Boyne Mountain Resort
MI
Caberfae Peaks
MI
Cannonsburg
MI
Crystal Mountain
MI
Big Snow Resort - Indianhead Mountain
MI
Marquette Mountain
MI
Mont Ripley
MI
Mount Bohemia
MI
Mt. Brighton
MI
Mt. Holiday Ski Area
MI
Mount Holly
MI
Mulligan's Hollow Ski Bowl
MI
Norway Mountain
MI
Nubs Nob Ski Area
MI
Schuss Mountain at Shanty Creek
MI
Ski Brule
MI
Swiss Valley
MI
The Homestead
MI
Afton Alps
MN
Andes Tower Hills Ski Area
MN
Buck Hill
MN
Buena Vista Ski Area
MN
Coffee Mill Ski & Snowboard Resort
MN
Giants Ridge Resort
MN
Hyland Ski & Snowboard Area
MN
Lutsen Mountains
MN
Mount Kato Ski Area
MN
Spirit Mountain
MN
Welch Village
MN
Wild Mountain Ski & Snowboard Area
MN
Hidden Valley Ski Area
MO
Snow Creek
MO
Big Sky Resort
MT
Blacktail Mountain Ski Area
MT
Bridger Bowl
MT
Discovery Ski Area
MT
Great Divide
MT
Lost Trail - Powder Mtn
MT
Maverick Mountain
MT
Montana Snowbowl
MT
Red Lodge Mountain
MT
Showdown Montana
MT
Teton Pass Ski Resort
MT
Whitefish Mountain Resort
MT
Diamond Peak
NV
Elko SnoBowl
NV
Lee Canyon
NV
Mt. Rose - Ski Tahoe
NV
Attitash
NH
Black Mountain
NH
Bretton Woods
NH
Cannon Mountain
NH
Cranmore Mountain Resort
NH
Crotched Mountain
NH
Dartmouth Skiway
NH
Gunstock
NH
King Pine
NH
Loon Mountain
NH
Mount Sunapee
NH
Pats Peak
NH
Ragged Mountain Resort
NH
Waterville Valley
NH
Whaleback Mountain
NH
Wildcat Mountain
NH
Campgaw Mountain
NJ
Mountain Creek Resort
NJ
41
Angel Fire Resort
NM
Pajarito Mountain Ski Area
NM
Red River
NM
Sandia Peak
NM
Sipapu Ski Resort
NM
Ski Apache
NM
Ski Santa Fe
NM
Taos Ski Valley
NM
Belleayre
NY
Brantling Ski Slopes
NY
Bristol Mountain
NY
Catamount
NY
Dry Hill Ski Area
NY
Gore Mountain
NY
Greek Peak
NY
Holiday Mountain
NY
Holiday Valley
NY
Holimont Ski Area
NY
Hunt Hollow Ski Club
NY
Hunter Mountain
NY
Kissing Bridge
NY
Labrador Mt.
NY
McCauley Mountain Ski Center
NY
Mount Peter Ski Area
NY
Oak Mountain
NY
Peek'n Peak
NY
Plattekill Mountain
NY
Royal Mountain Ski Area
NY
Snow Ridge
NY
Song Mountain
NY
Swain
NY
Titus Mountain
NY
Toggenburg Mountain
NY
West Mountain
NY
Whiteface Mountain Resort
NY
Willard Mountain
NY
Windham Mountain
NY
Woods Valley Ski Area
NY
Appalachian Ski Mountain
NC
Cataloochee Ski Area
NC
Sapphire Valley
NC
Beech Mountain Resort
NC
Sugar Mountain Resort
NC
Wolf Ridge Ski Resort
NC
Alpine Valley
OH
Boston Mills
OH
Brandywine
OH
Mad River Mountain
OH
Snow Trails
OH
Anthony Lakes Mountain Resort
OR
Cooper Spur
OR
Hoodoo Ski Area
OR
Mt. Ashland
OR
Mt. Bachelor
OR
Mt. Hood Meadows
OR
Mt. Hood Skibowl
OR
Timberline Lodge
OR
Willamette Pass
OR
Bear Creek Mountain Resort
PA
Ski Big Bear
PA
Blue Knob
PA
Blue Mountain Resort
PA
Camelback Mountain Resort
PA
Elk Mountain Ski Resort
PA
Jack Frost
PA
Liberty
PA
Mount Pleasant of Edinboro
PA
Roundtop Mountain Resort
PA
Seven Springs
PA
Shawnee Mountain Ski Area
PA
Ski Sawmill
PA
Montage Mountain
PA
Spring Mountain Ski Area
PA
Tussey Mountain
PA
Whitetail Resort
PA
Deer Mountain Ski Resort
SD
Terry Peak Ski Area
SD
Alta Ski Area
UT
Beaver Mountain
UT
Brian Head Resort
UT
Brighton Resort
UT
Deer Valley Resort
UT
Eagle Point
UT
Park City
UT
Powder Mountain
UT
Snowbasin
UT
Snowbird
UT
Solitude Mountain Resort
UT
Sundance
UT
Nordic Valley Resort
UT
Bolton Valley
VT
Bromley Mountain
VT
Burke Mountain
VT
Jay Peak
VT
Killington Resort
VT
Mad River Glen
VT
Magic Mountain
VT
Mount Snow
VT
Okemo Mountain Resort
VT
Pico Mountain
VT
Smugglers' Notch Resort
VT
Stowe Mountain Resort
VT
Stratton Mountain
VT
Sugarbush
VT
Suicide Six
VT
Bryce Resort
VA
Wintergreen Resort
VA
49 Degrees North
WA
42
Bluewood
WA
Crystal Mountain
WA
Mission Ridge
WA
Mt. Baker
WA
Mt. Spokane Ski and Snowboard Park
WA
Stevens Pass Resort
WA
The Summit at Snoqualmie
WA
White Pass
WA
Canaan Valley Resort
WV
Snowshoe Mountain Resort
WV
Timberline Four Seasons
WV
Winterplace Ski Resort
WV
Alpine Valley Resort
WI
Bruce Mound
WI
Cascade Mountain
WI
Christie Mountain
WI
Devils Head
WI
Grand Geneva
WI
Granite Peak Ski Area
WI
Mount La Crosse
WI
Nordic Mountain
WI
Sunburst
WI
Trollhaugen
WI
Tyrol Basin
WI
Whitecap Mountain
WI
Wilmot Mountain
WI
Grand Targhee Resort
WY
Hogadon Basin
WY
Jackson Hole
WY
Sleeping Giant Ski Resort
WY
Snow King Resort
WY
Snowy Range Ski & Recreation Area
WY
White Pine Ski Area
WY
43
8. References
Alessandrini, S. (2013). Quality of ski resorts and competition between the emilian apennines and
altipiani trentini: An estimate of the hedonic price. Review of Economic Analysis, 5(1), 42-69.
doi://www.rofea.org/index.php?journal=journal&page=issue&op=archive
Falk, M. (2009). Are multi-resort ski conglomerates more efficient? Managerial and Decision
Economics, 30(8), 529-538. doi://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-
1468/issues
Falk, M. (2011). International price differences in ski lift tickets. Schweizerische Zeitschrift Fur
Volkswirtschaft Und Statistik/Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 147(3), 303-336.
doi://www.sjes.ch/published.php
Falk, M. (2015). The demand for winter sports: Empirical evidence for the largest french ski-lift
operator. Tourism Economics, 21(3), 561-580. doi://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ip/tec
Firgo, M., & Kugler, A. (2018). Cooperative pricing in spatially differentiated markets. Regional Science
and Urban Economics, 73, 51-67. Retrieved
from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ecn&AN=1749194&site=ehost-
live&scope=site http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.07.008
Fonner, R. C., & Berrens, R. P. (2014). A hedonic pricing model of lift tickets for US alpine ski areas:
Examining the influence of crowding. Tourism Economics, 20(6), 1215-1233.
doi://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ip/tec
Mander, B. (2019, Mar 13,). Actually, the mega season pass is killing skiing. Outside
Magazine, Retrieved from https://www.outsideonline.com/2389964/ski-pass-epic-ikon
Megroz, G. (2018). On slippery slopes. Bloomberg Businessweek, (4588), 66. Retrieved
from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=132295407&site=ehost-
live&scope=site
Mulligan, J. G. (2011). Market size, service quality and competition in the US downhill ski
industry. Applied Economics Letters, 18(13-15), 1497-1500. doi://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rael20
Multi-mountain season passes available for the 2018/2019 season (other than epic and ikon). (2018).
Retrieved from https://www.snowridersinternational.org/news/2018/6/6/multi-mountain-season-
passes-available-for-the-20182019-season-other-than-epic-and-ikon
44
O'Neil, D. (2017, Feb 24,). The ski king of the southwest. Outside Magazine, Retrieved
from https://www.outsideonline.com/2159326/ski-king-southwest
Peruzzi, M. (2018, Nov 26,). The giant resort companies you hate are saving skiing. Outside
Magazine, Retrieved from https://www.outsideonline.com/2367016/keep-skiing-weird
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure
competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55. doi://www.journals.uchicago.edu/loi/jpe
Stock, K. (2019). One pass to ski them all. Bloomberg Businessweek, (4605), 56-61. Retrieved
from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=134982589&site=ehost-
live&scope=site
Vail Resorts, I.Vail resorts, inc. 10-K for the fiscal year ended july 31, 2018
Vanat, L. (2019). 2019 international report on snow &amp; mountain tourism. (). Retrieved
from https://www.vanat.ch/RM-world-report-2019.pdf
Zinman, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2016). Wintertime for deceptive advertising? American Economic Journal:
Applied Economics, 8(1), 177-192. doi://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/