Background: Historical Comparison Summary
12
• Inspection requirements standardized,
minimal (25) data fields and photos, visible
damages documented only, interior more
limited
• Limited technology,
volume/location/proximity favorable
• Limited bid/eyeball estimates
• Report visible issues ONLY
• Safety concerns documented without
financial consequences
• Pricing by investor/insurer by state
2002
2022
• Inspection requirements lack standardization,
extensive (80+) data fields and photos, visible
and non-visible damages documented,
interior on all vacant
• Complex technology with multiple systems
integrations, volume/location/proximity
disparate
• Detailed bid with cost estimator justification
• Penalties possible for non-visible issues
• Safety issues unacceptable as justification to
not complete services with a financial impact
• Pricing often by client or lowest
investor/insurer allowable