XI B 1. TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS - ROAD TRAFFIC 12
8
See note 1 under "Montenegro" in the "Historical
Information" section in the front matter of this volume.
9
See note 1 under “Netherlands” regarding
Aruba/Netherlands Antillies in the “Historical Information”
section in the front matter of this volume
10
See note 1 under “New Zealand” regarding Tokelau in the
“Historical Information” section in the front matter of this
volume.
11
In communications addressed to the Secretary-General
with reference to the accession by the Republic of Korea, the
Permanent Representatives of the Permanent Missions to the
United Nations of Bulgaria, Mongolia and Romania stated that
their Governments considered the said accession as null and
void since the authorities of South Korea had no right or
competence whatsoever to speak on behalf of Korea.
12
The former Yugoslavia had signed and ratified the
Convention on 19 September 1949 and 8 October 1956,
respectively, adopting the letters “YU” as Distinguishing sign
of vehicles in International Traffic. See also note 1 under
“Bosnia and Herzegovina”, “Croatia”, “former Yugoslavia”,
“Slovenia”, “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” and
“Yugoslavia” in the “Historical Information” section in the front
matter of this volume.
13
See under "Declarations and Reservations made upon
notification of territorial application" .
14
The Government of the United Kingdom has informed the
Secretary-General that it is unable to accept [the reservation to
article 33 of the Convention] because in its view it is not of the
kind which intending parties to the Convention have the right to
make.
15
Subsequently, in a notification received on 6 May 1994,
the Government of Bulgaria notified the Secretary-General that
it had decided to withdraw the reservation made upon accession
with regard to article 33. For the text of the reservation, see
United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 453, p. 354.
16
In a communication received on 8 December 1989, the
Government of Hungary notified the Secretary-General that it
had decided to withdraw its reservation to article 33 of the
Convention made upon accession. For the text of the
reservation see United Nations, Treaty Series , vol. 434, p.
288.
17
The Government of the United States of America has
informed the Secretary-General that it has no objection to this
reservation, but "considers that it may and hereby states that it
will apply this reservation reciprocally with respect to
Romania".
18
The Government of the United States of America has
informed the Secretary-General that it has no objection to this
reservation, but "considers that it may and hereby states that it
will apply this reservation reciprocally with respect to the Soviet
Union".
The Governments of Greece and of the Netherlands informed
the Secretary-General that they do not consider themselves
bound by the provisions to which the reservation is made, as far
as the Soviet Union is concerned.
19
At the 1949 United Nations Conference on Road and
Motor Transport, the Conference placed on record that there
would be no objection to a reservation by the United Kingdom
in respect of article 26 of the Convention. In the letter
transmitting the instrument of ratification of the Convention, the
Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom drew the
attention of the Secretary-General to the fact that ". . the
reservation made in respect of article 26 of the Convention omits
the phrase `and a white surface' between the words `a red reflex
reflector' and the words `in accordance with the domestic
legislation of the United Kingdom,' which were included in the
text of the reservation set out in sub-paragraph (d) of paragraph
7 of the Final Act of the United Nations Conference on Road
and Motor Transport, 1949. This omission is occasioned by the
fact that the white surface requirement has since been repealed
by United Kingdom legislation."
20
The Government of the Republic of Viet-Nam had
informed the Secretary-General that it objects to the reservation
made to article 33 of the Convention. (See also note 1 under
“Viet Nam” in the “Historical Information” section in the front
matter of this volume.
21
In a communication received by the Secretary-General on
12 June 1972, the Permanent Representative of Japan to the
United Nations, upon instructions from his Government, made
the following statement:
"Japan has assumed as of May 15, 1972 full responsibility and
authority for the exercise of all and any powers of
administration, legislation and jurisdiction over "Okinawa" in
accordance with the Agreement between Japan and the United
States of America concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito
Islands signed on June 17, 1971. Under the United States
administration, all vehicles were required to keep to the right
side of the road in Okinawa. Upon reversion of Okinawa to
Japan, the Government of Japan began to take the measures, in
conformity with Article 9, paragraph 1 of the Convention on
Road Traffic, necessary for shifting the side to which vehicles
are required to keep in Okinawa from the right to the left so that
there shall be uniformity with the rest of Japan. It is estimated
that it will take at least three years before the changes may be
smoothly carried out."
Subsequently, in a communication received on 21 August
1978, the Government of Japan informed the Secretary-General
that "the said change was completed as of July 30, 1978, there
being now the uniform ity in Okinawa with the rest of Japan in
conformity with article 9, paragraph 1 of the said Convention".
22
See note 1 under “United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland” in the “Historical Information” section in the
front matter of this volume.
23
For declarations and reservations made by these territories
upon accession or notification of succession after attaining
statehood, see under "Declarations and Reservations" .
24
In a communication received on 11 May 1971, the
Government of the United Kingdom informed the Secretary-
General of the follow- ing: