Brow Ptosis and Eyelid Repair
UnitedHealthcare Commercial and Individual Exchange Medical Policy
Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2023 United HealthCare Services, Inc.
UnitedHealthcare excludes Cosmetic Procedures from coverage including but not limited to the following:
• Procedures that correct an anatomical Congenital Anomaly without improving or restoring physiologic function are
considered Cosmetic Procedures. The fact that a Covered Person may suffer psychological consequences or socially
avoidant behavior as a result of an Injury, Sickness or Congenital Anomaly does not classify surgery (or other
procedures done to relieve such consequences or behavior) as a Reconstructive Procedure.
Clinical Evidence
Internal Browpexy
Korn et al. (2016) cited that an internal browpexy will not elevate a severely ptotic brow and in general should only be
considered when minimal brow ptosis is present or if stabilization and prevention of descent of the eyebrow is desired.
The author noted that the principal disadvantage of an internal browpexy is the limited effect and questionable longevity.
Floppy Eyelid Syndrome (FES)
Cheong et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between obstructive
sleep apnea (OSA) and FES. The systematic review included 12 studies, nine of which were included in the meta-
analysis, with a total of 1,109 individuals. The analysis of the data determined a significant association between OSA and
FES (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.27-2.83, I 2 = 44%). Upon further investigation the study determined the more severe the
OSA was, the higher the risk of developing FES. Patients with severe OSA had the highest risk of developing FES (OR =
3.06, 95% CI = 1.62-5.78, I 2 = 0%), followed by moderate OSA (OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.29-4.97, I 2 = 0%), and patients
with mild OSA had the lowest risk (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 0.85-3.62, I 2 = 0%). The authors concluded there was a positive
association between OSA and FES with increasing severity of OSA correlating with significantly higher risk of FES.
Limitations in the study were important covariates such as age, gender and body mass index were not adjusted. The
authors recommend more longitudinal studies with sufficient duration of follow-up to better characterize the relationship
between OSA and FES.
Acar et al. (2021) conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 51 patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea
syndrome (OSAHS) to assess the long-term effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on the eyelid and the ocular
surface. Over a period of 18 months patients were treated with PAP then the scores were compared for the pre- and post-
PAP values for eye examination which included the presence of FES, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire
results, Schirmer I test, tear film breakup time (TBUT), and corneal staining. The presence of FES before and after PAP
was 56.9% and 74.5% (p < 0.01). FES stage was determined as 1.41 ±0.98 before PAP and 0.78 ±0.78 after PAP (p <
0.01). Pre-PAP and post-PAP ocular surface disease index OSDI results were 47.79 ±21.04 and 42.17 ±19.97, (p < 0.01).
Schirmer values before and after PAP were 7.23 ±1.95 and 8.49 ±1.79 mm, (p < 0.01). TBUT values before and after PAP
were 7.11 ±1.82 and 8.68 ±1.76 seconds, (p < 0.01). Scores of the corneal staining stages before and after PAP were
1.05 ±0.75 and 0.68 ±0.54, (p < 0.01). The authors concluded OSAHS was associated with low Schirmer and TBUT
values, high scores on the OSDI questionnaire, and high corneal staining. Normal sleep patterns returned after
appropriate use of PAP along with relief of systemic findings and ocular surface problems. The authors believe long term
use of PAP (at least one year) improves FES and overcomes the problem of ocular irritation that occurs in the early stage
of PAP therapy. Limitations of the study include lack of blinding when performing the ocular screenings and small sample
size.
De Gregorio et al. (2021) published an article reviewing the demographics, pathogenesis, and treatment of FES. FES is a
frequent and under-diagnosed eyelid disorder syndrome characterized by eyelid laxity that determines a spontaneous
eyelid eversion during sleep associated with chronic papillary conjunctivitis and systemic diseases. Many types of
involutional, local and systemic diseases can cause eyelid laxity. FES is characterized by upper eyelids that easily distort
and turn out with minimal lateral traction and the tarsus appears soft, rubbery, and easily folded. Patients present with
marked papillary conjunctivitis underneath the eyelids with symptoms of ocular discomfort. The patients usually complain
of tearing, redness, irritation such as photosensitivity, foreign body sensation, pain, mucoid discharge, dryness, eyelid
swelling and blurred vision. Corneal punctate erosions, keratitis, and abrasions are often reasons for ophthalmological
examine. In addition, clinical features may include dermatochalasis, trichiasis, entropion, ectropion, eyelid, and lash
ptosis, meibomian gland dysfunction and recurrent chalazia. Patients with FES are often obese with a BMI > 30kg/m, and
frequently affected by OSAHS. FES has been reported as the most frequent ocular disorder associated with OSAHS. FES
is treated with topical medication for related ocular surface diseases, medical therapy, and/or with surgical approach. If
medical management of FES fails, surgical approach may be indicated for both symptomatic relief and preservation of
ocular surface integrity. Various surgical techniques have been proposed for the correction of the superior eyelid laxity,
focusing on the resolution of the upper eyelid spontaneous eversion. The authors concluded due to these clinical features
FES occurs more frequently than expected because it is often under-diagnosed and misdiagnosed. Due to frequent